The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 974 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Elena Whitham
Should a requirement be put into the 2000 act for park authorities to consult a wider suite of public bodies on their plans? Right now, it feels like consultation is restricted to local authorities. Although I think that they all feed in in some way, should the duty be explicitly widened to include further public bodies?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Elena Whitham
Some of my questions have been touched on by the convener.
I will say from the get-go that I first heard about the Galloway national park back in 2016, nine years ago. I was a local councillor in East Ayrshire in 2018, when that council took what I viewed as a positive decision to support the national park after doing extensive public consultation on the back of what the Galloway National Park Association was doing.
The idea of the park did end up feeling like a bolt out of the blue for some sectors, including farming, forestry and renewables. We seemed to get to a point where those sectors became galvanised after suddenly realising that the park might have an impact on them and feeling that their voices had not been heard in the mix. I do not think that anyone can apportion the blame for that to the people from the Galloway National Park Association, because they set out their vision and took it out to people and they consulted quite extensively from 2016 onwards.
Having listened to the other members around the table and yourself, I am wondering how we can ensure that sectoral issues and any further proposals that affect real people on the ground who are farming or who are part of forestry or renewables do not get to the stage where it feels as though people are getting entrenched. There was a groundswell of support, but all of a sudden it got to a crunch point where it felt as if there was not, and some sectors felt that they were not being heard. How do we deal with that? How do we overcome challenges from those sectors to get to a positive conclusion?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Elena Whitham
Let me explore a little bit further how, as an organisation, you are able to track, monitor and evaluate quality improvement. We have heard about some of the tools that you already use, such as self-evaluation forms and using complaints themselves as tools. What other tools do you have to track, monitor and evaluate improvement?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Elena Whitham
It is really good to hear that you have been able to feed in your concerns and that the linkages are robust in relation to what you expect the draft plan to say.
There was also a bit of worry about where your role stopped and the Scottish Food Commission’s role started and how that was going to be managed. Do you feel that there is now a clear division of responsibilities there?
11:30Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Elena Whitham
It is helpful for the committee to understand that.
Thinking about the most recent corporate plan, can you identify any improvements in social care that you have been part of and have helped to drive forward?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Elena Whitham
I have a final question. It has come to our attention that the Care Inspectorate does not seem to be represented on the interim national care service advisory board. What involvement, if any, have you had with the board? What involvement will you have with it going forward?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Elena Whitham
To what extent has FSS been involved in the development of the draft national good food nation plan? In the evidence that you provided to the committee in 2024, you expressed some concerns about some of the linkages between the actions and the intended outcomes. Are you satisfied that those concerns have been addressed or do some concerns remain?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Elena Whitham
Are there any barriers to achieving that aspirational vision? Have you identified what is making it difficult for the Care Inspectorate to achieve it?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Elena Whitham
We have heard several times this morning that the resourcing is very tight. Are you satisfied that no extra workload will be added for you, given the resourcing that you have? You described it as being about working in parallel without extra pressure being added.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Elena Whitham
That is very helpful. We have heard this morning about your wonderful food crime unit and how effective it is. We would not want anything to take away from your ability to do that work. Thank you.