The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2839 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
I am sorry, convener, but I cannot answer questions about individual cases.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
The purpose of the order is to allow Transport Scotland to take actions to remove a bus pass from someone who is committing antisocial behaviour. I am not going to comment on the death of Mr Rollinson and I am not going to go any further with this conversation about him. I think that it is inappropriate and disrespectful. I am sorry, Mr Lumsden, but I am finding it really distasteful, because we are discussing an order that is about antisocial behaviour going forward, not about something that has happened in the past. I cannot give guarantees on anything in relation to Mr Rollinson’s position, and I would rather not discuss Mr Rollinson’s position.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
It is not about whether I have a view. It is about the process that we are putting in place and about the fact that the Parliament and stakeholders are asking us to put an SSI in place to allow the Government and Transport Scotland to go through a process to remove somebody’s right to have free bus travel.
I am afraid that you are completely mischaracterising what has been discussed, which is unfortunate, because I hoped that, given that it has been a demand from the entire Parliament, we would get to the point at which the SSI gets passed.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
We have already discussed that. If an incident takes place on a bus, Transport Scotland will scrutinise that in conjunction with the discussions that it has had with stakeholders about whether it is appropriate to remove a bus pass. We will not sit here and give a prescriptive list.
I have also said that the instrument is deliberately broad to allow the proper scrutiny by Transport Scotland, in its wisdom, to decide whether the pass should be removed.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
Which is criminality.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
We already have zero tolerance of criminality and the justiciary will go through the process to prosecute criminality. What we are talking about is antisocial behaviour, which is a different thing. If there is criminal behaviour, the police and other authorities carry out the processes that they have to carry out to deal with that. This is about giving Transport Scotland the ability to remove the entitlement to a bus pass if somebody is displaying antisocial behaviour, being foul and abusive, hurting someone physically or harassing people in any way.
We are discussing two different things here. I absolutely agree, 100 per cent, that there is zero tolerance of violence; I could not agree more. However, that is not what this is. The direct result of somebody committing violence and then being convicted of a crime is, in all likelihood, that they will lose their use of a bus pass, but that would be incidental to the fact that they have been prosecuted for criminality.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
Yes, they would be.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
The condition in the particular scheme in this SSI is that companies will be left no better and no worse off. This is not seen as a direct benefit in terms of putting more people on buses; it is a no better, no worse approach, which is why the rate goes up or down slightly.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
That would very much depend on how many people continued to use the bus. A lot of people have no choice but to use the bus, and they would end up paying for it themselves. The people who would be hurt would be the passengers, not the bus companies.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
That would be a decision for the Cabinet, not for me.