Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 1 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2839 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jim Fairlie

I agree. I seem to remember that we had a similar conversation when we were talking about the derogation for eggs, so we had a discussion before I came to committee about how we would be able to give that assurance to consumers. So far, we have seen that supermarkets are keen to make sure that people understand what is happening with their food supply, because it is in their best interests to do that.

I could be wrong, but I think that we talked previously about whether we should be able to compel supermarkets to tell people that there is a housing order in place. We have looked at whether that is feasible, but at the moment, it is not necessary because supermarkets and retailers are very comfortable with the fact that if there is a housing order in place, it is in their best interests to make sure that consumers know what is happening. We do not have any concerns on that point at the moment.

I am sorry, but if there was a second point, I have missed it—I apologise.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jim Fairlie

No. Joe Kirk and I were discussing that just before we came in. In the early days—Joe will correct me if I am wrong—officials went out to see what supermarkets were putting on their eggs to make sure that the labelling was compliant with the requirement that the information is relevant and not misleading. If there was a housing order in place, the label would say that the eggs are from a free-range flock, but that the birds were currently housed due to avian flu, or words to that effect—I remember seeing that in Tesco.

From our point of view, there are no concerns that supermarkets would not continue to have the view that it is in their and the consumers’ best interests to understand exactly what is going on at any given time.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jim Fairlie

I am not sure how we tackle zoonotic diseases in a transient wild bird population. There needs to be an understanding that we have transient and migratory bird populations, which is why they are rises in avian flu at certain times of the year. I do not know how you eradicate that in the wild, if that is your question.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jim Fairlie

I am sorry, convener, but I am being a bit dense. I do not understand the question.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jim Fairlie

I will defer to Joe Kirk.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jim Fairlie

Those birds would not already have free-range status; under this instrument, the birds would already need to have that status. This only works when a housing order is put in place by the chief veterinary officer. Somebody with indoor chickens cannot claim that they are free range if they do not already have that free-range status.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jim Fairlie

Yes.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jim Fairlie

I have not given any consideration to that on the basis that we do not have anyone in this country right now who is doing free-range poultry meat. There might be measures in England that Joe Kirk is better versed in and can tell you about.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jim Fairlie

NatureScot’s inclusion was part of the deer working group’s advice—that is who recommended it. I disagree that there would be a conflict of interest. This line of questioning makes it feel as though the purpose of the bill is to come in with a big stick—it is not; it is about our ability to work collaboratively.

There is no way that the Government, NatureScot or any other individual body will immediately be able to tackle the challenges of deer management on its own. It will have to be collaborative. There can be someone from NatureScot with particular expertise sitting on a panel, but they will not necessarily have to sit on every panel. In fact, I am not even sure how many panels we have at the moment. I think that one was set out in 2018 for a deer management group in lowland Scotland.

I do not see having expertise on a panel as a conflict of interest; I see it as enabling us to get the best decisions that we can on how to manage deer.

12:00  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jim Fairlie

There is already provision for the tenants that you are talking about to control deer and stop them marauding, and so on. Section 26 of the 1996 act gives occupiers the right to take deer when they might not otherwise have the right to do so, including in “enclosed woodland” and on some agricultural land where they are causing damage. The deer working group recommended that section 26 be extended to provide that occupiers can take action to prevent damage by wild deer across

“any type of land and cover public interests of a social, economic and environmental nature.”

The rationale for that was largely the fact that the types of occupiers have changed in the past 30 years.

There is provision for that in the bill already, but if we need to look at anything else, I will be happy to hear about it.