The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2839 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jim Fairlie
I agree. I seem to remember that we had a similar conversation when we were talking about the derogation for eggs, so we had a discussion before I came to committee about how we would be able to give that assurance to consumers. So far, we have seen that supermarkets are keen to make sure that people understand what is happening with their food supply, because it is in their best interests to do that.
I could be wrong, but I think that we talked previously about whether we should be able to compel supermarkets to tell people that there is a housing order in place. We have looked at whether that is feasible, but at the moment, it is not necessary because supermarkets and retailers are very comfortable with the fact that if there is a housing order in place, it is in their best interests to make sure that consumers know what is happening. We do not have any concerns on that point at the moment.
I am sorry, but if there was a second point, I have missed it—I apologise.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jim Fairlie
No. Joe Kirk and I were discussing that just before we came in. In the early days—Joe will correct me if I am wrong—officials went out to see what supermarkets were putting on their eggs to make sure that the labelling was compliant with the requirement that the information is relevant and not misleading. If there was a housing order in place, the label would say that the eggs are from a free-range flock, but that the birds were currently housed due to avian flu, or words to that effect—I remember seeing that in Tesco.
From our point of view, there are no concerns that supermarkets would not continue to have the view that it is in their and the consumers’ best interests to understand exactly what is going on at any given time.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jim Fairlie
I am not sure how we tackle zoonotic diseases in a transient wild bird population. There needs to be an understanding that we have transient and migratory bird populations, which is why they are rises in avian flu at certain times of the year. I do not know how you eradicate that in the wild, if that is your question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jim Fairlie
I am sorry, convener, but I am being a bit dense. I do not understand the question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jim Fairlie
I will defer to Joe Kirk.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jim Fairlie
Those birds would not already have free-range status; under this instrument, the birds would already need to have that status. This only works when a housing order is put in place by the chief veterinary officer. Somebody with indoor chickens cannot claim that they are free range if they do not already have that free-range status.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jim Fairlie
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jim Fairlie
I have not given any consideration to that on the basis that we do not have anyone in this country right now who is doing free-range poultry meat. There might be measures in England that Joe Kirk is better versed in and can tell you about.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
NatureScot’s inclusion was part of the deer working group’s advice—that is who recommended it. I disagree that there would be a conflict of interest. This line of questioning makes it feel as though the purpose of the bill is to come in with a big stick—it is not; it is about our ability to work collaboratively.
There is no way that the Government, NatureScot or any other individual body will immediately be able to tackle the challenges of deer management on its own. It will have to be collaborative. There can be someone from NatureScot with particular expertise sitting on a panel, but they will not necessarily have to sit on every panel. In fact, I am not even sure how many panels we have at the moment. I think that one was set out in 2018 for a deer management group in lowland Scotland.
I do not see having expertise on a panel as a conflict of interest; I see it as enabling us to get the best decisions that we can on how to manage deer.
12:00Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
There is already provision for the tenants that you are talking about to control deer and stop them marauding, and so on. Section 26 of the 1996 act gives occupiers the right to take deer when they might not otherwise have the right to do so, including in “enclosed woodland” and on some agricultural land where they are causing damage. The deer working group recommended that section 26 be extended to provide that occupiers can take action to prevent damage by wild deer across
“any type of land and cover public interests of a social, economic and environmental nature.”
The rationale for that was largely the fact that the types of occupiers have changed in the past 30 years.
There is provision for that in the bill already, but if we need to look at anything else, I will be happy to hear about it.