The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2837 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
If we get absolute clarity on what you have just stated, we can come back to you. My understanding at the moment is that the legal ownership of carbon credits is still to be fully determined.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
That is exactly why shared community conversations should be going on, until we have clarity.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
I think that it is vitally important. When the requirement for a Gaelic-speaking member of the court was first established in statute in 1912, Gaelic speakers had no protection in law. The inclusion of that requirement created an opportunity for Gaelic speakers to use their language of preference in at least one institutional setting of importance to them. The requirement was also an important recognition of the worth of the language and of its speakers, and it is important that that respect for the language is not lost.
The 2020 consultation on the future of the Lands Tribunal and the Land Court gauged opinion on whether the Land Court required to have a Gaelic-speaking member, and the majority of respondents considered that essential. Many of the stakeholders who are in favour of maintaining the requirement for a Gaelic-speaking member have noted that, for many crofters, Gaelic is their first language, and that that identity must be acknowledged to ensure that their civil and human rights are not eroded.
Stakeholders also highlighted that there is a close relationship between the Gaelic language, the land and crofting. There is reasoning in the Gaelic language that does not transfer into English, meaning that an argument can sometimes be made properly only in Gaelic, and it requires a Gaelic speaker to fully understand the points. From a personal point of view, it is a heritage that I believe we should cling on to dearly. That is despite the fact that I cannot speak the language, although I would very much like to.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
I am generally aware of that, given the fact that I am not a Gael. I cannot give a specific answer, I am afraid.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
The thing about crofting is that it is supposed to be about crofting communities, and I would hope that those communities would work together. Anyone who has been in the crofting counties and communities will know that there is always the potential for difficulties, but my understanding is that, if there are individual disputes, the Crofting Commission will have a role to play in making sure that they are agreed amicably for the benefit of the entire community.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
We are trying to establish an agreed approach whereby a croft, tenant or owner-occupier would have to apply to the commission to divide the grazings share from a croft and would have to state a reasonable purpose for doing so. Therefore, we have to trust the commission to regulate that activity and to ensure that the right balance is struck between grazings shares being in the hands of those who will use them and protecting against too many shares being separated from crofts. I understand people’s concerns, because, in the past, the Crofting Commission was not enforcing duties—I am trying to be polite—and was not deemed to be doing its job appropriately. That is not the position just now. The Crofting Commission is in very good hands at the moment, and people understand that it is doing its job properly to find the right balance for the communities that it works with. That is where we are at the moment.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
When I gave evidence to the committee at that time, I had not met Mr Ruskell or looked at the specific considerations in relation to greyhound racing on an oval track, which is the aspect that the bill is now focused on. When Mr Ruskell introduced his bill, he spoke about dogs hitting that first bend at 40mph. There is no way of removing that risk while racing continues to take place on oval tracks. That is the specific reason why the Government is now prepared to support the bill.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
The sound evidence base relates to oval tracks and dogs hitting the first bend at 40mph. Mr Ruskell has given evidence to the committee on how that affects the front part of the dog.
There is evidence to suggest that there are dangers to the dogs. There is also the danger that the speed at which they are going and the fact that they can lose their footing on that bend can result in collisions and the dogs hitting barriers. All those things put an inherent risk on that part of the track.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
The penalties that we are looking at will be in line with the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006, and that is the maximum penalty available under that act. Rather than have a bespoke system specifically for greyhounds, it will probably be better to tie the penalties in to the 2006 act. That does not mean that it is a given that the maximum penalty will be applied. That is not for the Government to decide; it is for the judiciary and whoever the case is in front of.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
Yes.