The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2173 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Jim Fairlie
Okay—we will take that away. Brian Service has heard everything that you have said.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Jim Fairlie
No, but I will pass over to Brian Service with regard to where that sits.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Jim Fairlie
I will let Brian Service answer that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Jim Fairlie
Is that right, John?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Jim Fairlie
This conditionality was originally part of the thinking of the farmer-led groups that were chaired on the beef sector. As the committee will know, there were five farmer-led groups; one of the issues that was being examined was beef efficiency, and reducing the calving interval was, through work that the groups had carried out, designated as the best way of reducing emissions for the beef sector. A number of other areas were looked at, but this was the approach that was plumped for.
Reducing the calving interval means, in effect, that cows are in the system while producing beef but are not emitting emissions when they are, as it were, blank. If a cow is running for a year without a calf, she will produce a lot of methane without producing any beef for the food sector. That was the thinking behind it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Jim Fairlie
That depends on the fertility cycle of a particular cow. An Angus has a shorter gestation than a Limousin, Jerseys have a longer gestation than Friesians. You do not want to get into breeds—this is about simplicity. The median calving index, at the moment, is 400 days; we have set a relatively high threshold of 410 days. As time goes on, we will reduce the calving index as the national herd gets into that system.
We deliberately kept the threshold at 410 days for this year and next year to allow people to adapt—to get that mindset and thinking—and it will reduce over time. Rather than getting into the complications of what breed, what season, whether the cow calved early and so on, the idea is straightforward: a threshold of 410 days, which will be reduced to 400 days and then 390 days as the process goes on. We bring the national herd calving index down, which reduces emissions.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Jim Fairlie
Well, I do not agree with the premises that small herds would be shut out of the scheme or that farmers will force a cow to get into calf. If a cow is not going to cycle, she is not going to cycle—you cannot force her to get into calf. Lots of consultation took place with lots of stakeholders right across the sector, and there was general agreement that the system would work.
As we get into the system, if we later need to look at particular issues for the smaller producers that you have talked about, we might be able to do so. However, there was general consensus that this is the system that would work and that we would go with.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Jim Fairlie
Steven Thomson of Scotland’s Rural College—SRUC—did some work on whether native breeds had a longer gestation. They do not—Angus have a shorter gestation than Limousins do. I raised that point, because I was always under the impression that native-bred cattle had a longer gestation than other breeds, but that is not the case. Professor Thomson has done extensive work on the matter, and he has proven that point.
We would not look to put people out of business, and I am sure that Rhoda Grant accepts that that is not what we are trying to do. However, we need to start somewhere. We are starting at 410 days to allow everybody to get into the system and the ways of working with it.
I fully accept that there is potential for smaller herd sizes to be more directly impacted if a number of cows are not in calf for some reason. That is why I mentioned to the convener that we will look at potential force majeure issues. However, I will not sit here today and work through all the hypotheticals, because we will need to consider a number of factors. With regard to the smaller producers whom you talk to and represent, I absolutely take on board your point and note that we are thinking about that.
09:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Jim Fairlie
Yes, it is not disqualified from the scheme forever—it is only for that one slip.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Jim Fairlie
Your point is well made and it has landed.