Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 30 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2173 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Jim Fairlie

Okay—we will take that away. Brian Service has heard everything that you have said.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Jim Fairlie

No, but I will pass over to Brian Service with regard to where that sits.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Jim Fairlie

I will let Brian Service answer that.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Jim Fairlie

Is that right, John?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Jim Fairlie

This conditionality was originally part of the thinking of the farmer-led groups that were chaired on the beef sector. As the committee will know, there were five farmer-led groups; one of the issues that was being examined was beef efficiency, and reducing the calving interval was, through work that the groups had carried out, designated as the best way of reducing emissions for the beef sector. A number of other areas were looked at, but this was the approach that was plumped for.

Reducing the calving interval means, in effect, that cows are in the system while producing beef but are not emitting emissions when they are, as it were, blank. If a cow is running for a year without a calf, she will produce a lot of methane without producing any beef for the food sector. That was the thinking behind it.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Jim Fairlie

That depends on the fertility cycle of a particular cow. An Angus has a shorter gestation than a Limousin, Jerseys have a longer gestation than Friesians. You do not want to get into breeds—this is about simplicity. The median calving index, at the moment, is 400 days; we have set a relatively high threshold of 410 days. As time goes on, we will reduce the calving index as the national herd gets into that system.

We deliberately kept the threshold at 410 days for this year and next year to allow people to adapt—to get that mindset and thinking—and it will reduce over time. Rather than getting into the complications of what breed, what season, whether the cow calved early and so on, the idea is straightforward: a threshold of 410 days, which will be reduced to 400 days and then 390 days as the process goes on. We bring the national herd calving index down, which reduces emissions.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Jim Fairlie

Well, I do not agree with the premises that small herds would be shut out of the scheme or that farmers will force a cow to get into calf. If a cow is not going to cycle, she is not going to cycle—you cannot force her to get into calf. Lots of consultation took place with lots of stakeholders right across the sector, and there was general agreement that the system would work.

As we get into the system, if we later need to look at particular issues for the smaller producers that you have talked about, we might be able to do so. However, there was general consensus that this is the system that would work and that we would go with.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Jim Fairlie

Steven Thomson of Scotland’s Rural College—SRUC—did some work on whether native breeds had a longer gestation. They do not—Angus have a shorter gestation than Limousins do. I raised that point, because I was always under the impression that native-bred cattle had a longer gestation than other breeds, but that is not the case. Professor Thomson has done extensive work on the matter, and he has proven that point.

We would not look to put people out of business, and I am sure that Rhoda Grant accepts that that is not what we are trying to do. However, we need to start somewhere. We are starting at 410 days to allow everybody to get into the system and the ways of working with it.

I fully accept that there is potential for smaller herd sizes to be more directly impacted if a number of cows are not in calf for some reason. That is why I mentioned to the convener that we will look at potential force majeure issues. However, I will not sit here today and work through all the hypotheticals, because we will need to consider a number of factors. With regard to the smaller producers whom you talk to and represent, I absolutely take on board your point and note that we are thinking about that.

09:15  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Jim Fairlie

Yes, it is not disqualified from the scheme forever—it is only for that one slip.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Jim Fairlie

Your point is well made and it has landed.