The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2839 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Jim Fairlie
To finish the point that I was making, the measures include the potential to have travel safety officers. We are continually looking at how we make sure that public transport is safe.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Jim Fairlie
I absolutely appreciate those concerns and all the considerations that we have heard from Young Scot, which has every ability to feed into the code of conduct—that is absolutely at the foundation of how the code of conduct is being drawn up. However, I absolutely take on board the committee’s concern that there are questions that we cannot answer at this stage. We can say, however, that we want to proceed with the principle of being able to remove the concessionary card.
I take the convener’s earlier point about withdrawing this Scottish statutory instrument and coming back with it. My concern is the timescales for the parliamentary process, given where we are in the parliamentary session. I hope that we can take enough comfort from the team that is pulling together the documentation that it will approach this properly and equitably, ensuring that fairness is at the heart of what they are trying to do. My officials are more than capable of that.
I therefore ask the committee to agree to the principle of allowing us to remove the card if the thresholds have been met.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Jim Fairlie
The code will come with guidance. I will ask Eilidh McCabe to confirm whether that is right.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Jim Fairlie
No. There would not be a further vote on the principle of allowing the concessionary cards to be removed. The code of conduct would come back to the committee for it to comment on and feed into so that we have as broad a range of views—from the committee and from the people who have written to us—as possible. That is to make sure that the code covers everything that we need it to cover. I will provide a copy of the current draft code for the committee to feed comments into it. We will take on board the new stuff that we have heard today, and that will help us to put together a final code of conduct that should then be put in place.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Jim Fairlie
The reason why it is taking so long to get the code of conduct is precisely so that we look at all the issues that have been raised by the committee today. You are absolutely correct: it is vital that we get it right. The process must have fairness, equity and parameters, and it must understand context, as Bob Doris was saying. I completely take on board all those things. The principle of being able to remove a pass was the primary reason for laying the SSI at this stage, so that we could get the process moving and ensure that we did not run out of parliamentary time to get it done. I hope that the committee has enough confidence that the work that you are all asking about is being undertaken and that it will be done diligently by the team of officials who are working on it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Jim Fairlie
As I said earlier, we are looking at potential visible safety measures, including travel safety officers—we can call them that just now—which some private operators already have.
On how we will publicise it, there are a number of routes for how that will be done. A lot of it will be through social media, if it is targeted at young people, but there will be other things that we can do to ensure that people understand it.
Passing the SSI is a signal that the kind of behaviour that you rightly talk about as unacceptable will be tackled. All of this will build up the momentum to make sure that people understand that, with a bus pass, there is a responsibility as well as a right. Therefore, the code of conduct has to be clear and understood by people.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Jim Fairlie
They would reapply to get their bus pass back.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Jim Fairlie
My understanding is that that was not considered. If the entitlement is removed, the entitlement is removed completely.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Jim Fairlie
No—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Jim Fairlie
If someone has had their card removed, they will have gone through a process to ensure that that was appropriate. The scheme was never about giving free travel to children to get to school—we were absolutely clear about that. If there is a requirement for the local authority to provide that person’s travel to school and it has chosen to let pupils use the concessionary travel scheme instead, that is a local authority issue. It is not an issue for the scheme.