The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2160 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jim Fairlie
I want to pick up on a couple of things. The term “inherent risk” has been used several times today. We do not regulate field trials for spaniels or Labradors, sheepdog trials, agility dog trials or pigeon racing. Do you have concerns about those? I am looking for a straight yes or no answer; I do not want you to go into any depth. Gilly Mendes Ferreira, that question is for you, because Claire Calder will not have any comment on pigeons.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jim Fairlie
Have you, as the Dogs Trust, attended the Thornton greyhound track either incognito or in an official capacity? You said that you had taken in a number of dogs and you cited the Welsh unregistered track. Do you have figures for the number of dogs that have been raced in Scotland that you have had to deal with?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jim Fairlie
Do I have time for another very quick question, convener?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jim Fairlie
Gilly Mendes Ferreira, I apologise that I am coming back to you. You talked about the individual you visited whom you could not bring any prosecution against. I have a couple of questions that you might not be able to answer. First, how did you know that the dog required a visit from you to establish whether its welfare was in jeopardy?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jim Fairlie
Surely, then, that is the responsibility of the person who owns the dog and not the track.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jim Fairlie
The public choose not to go to it. That is a clear distinction.
I come back to the point that the issue is the individual who holds the animal as opposed to the pastime itself and to the point that Mark Ruskell made, about which he and I have spoken, about finding a method of allowing people who genuinely love their dogs and want to race them safely—they do not want anything to happen to them—to continue without completely banning the sport. Those people do love their dogs.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jim Fairlie
I do not know whether we will come back to that issue. I might come back—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jim Fairlie
Okay. You may have given a lot of the answers in your report, but unfortunately we only had it about 20 minutes before the meeting. We will have to digest it before we can come back to you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jim Fairlie
They are sight animals and they are all looking at one lure. Has any work been done on putting two lures on to the same race, to spread out the field?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jim Fairlie
I understand why the lure is on the inside or the outside of the track. My point is that, because they are sight animals, there is bunching at particular corners at high speed, as you referenced. That bunching will happen because they are all looking at the same lure. Has any work been done on double lures?