The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2667 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
Are you finished?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I reiterate the point that we are keen to make sure that we progress to a UK-wide database that will work in exactly the way that people want it to.
I am happy to speak to the member between now and stage 3, and to give any updates before stage 3, if there are any to give at that point.
I reiterate the point that we are very serious about trying to get this done. It is not something that we are just trying to brush off.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I thank Edward Mountain for explaining the purpose of amendment 59 and Rachael Hamilton for explaining the purpose of amendment 78. Those amendments are very similar, so I will give the Scottish Government’s views on them together.
Scottish Government officials are working with counterparts in the other UK Administrations to explore the potential for a single-point search portal for all microchip database operators across the UK, in order to provide transparency in obtaining relevant information when required. That work would incorporate the information that would be collected by the review that amendment 78 would require and could address the issue that is being raised. It is felt that resource would be better spent on working with other UK Administrations than on undertaking a review and producing a report. I therefore do not support amendments 59 and 78 and ask the members not to press them.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I have not had any formal discussions with the UK Government about a microchip database. However, I attended a meeting in London on Monday and had a conversation with Andrew Muir, the Northern Irish delegate for agriculture. We talked about the problem of puppies coming across from Larne and have begun a conversation about how the bill could help to inform a UK-wide approach to creating a database to allow us to get past that problem. We are taking it extremely seriously but, at this stage, because of the resources that would be needed, we would rather work UK-wide than set up a separate Scottish database.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
Would you like to make your point now, too, Rachael?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I am, yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I thank Rhoda Grant for the explanation of the purpose of her amendments. The intention of the bill as introduced is recognised in the policy memorandum, which states that the intention is
“to achieve behavioural change, without placing formal legal obligations on the parties involved”.
There is a long-standing convention that codes of practice made under the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006 generally use the word “must”, when there is a directly enforceable legal requirement to do something, which will not be the case under the bill. Therefore, the Scottish Government’s view is that amendments 64, 67, 68 and 70 are unnecessary and potentially misleading. I do not support the amendments and I ask the member not to press them.
Amendment 54 leaves out section 12, which is the interpretation section of the bill, because the effect of my other amendments is that all the definitions are either no longer used or are moved to sit in the operational sections to which they relate.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
The amendments in my name remove the specific questions from the bill, as suggested by the committee at stage 1. The broad themes underlying the questions will continue to be listed as things that a prospective acquirer should consider before acquiring a dog. However, we fully understand and share Christine Grahame’s desire to have the code and certificate written in simple and straightforward language that is easy for the public to understand. I give an assurance now that that is what we expect to be produced.
The suggestion in Ariane Burgess’s amendment 1 that identifying a veterinary practice could be included within the proposed code of practice is a good one, but that sort of detail should be left to be employed by officials and stakeholders as the code is developed. Therefore, I ask her not to press that amendment.
I move amendment 19.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I absolutely agree. I like the proposal as well. I might even go so far as to say that it should be both the acquirer and the seller who are notified about who the vet is.
I agree with everything that Ariane Burgess is saying. However, I think that the matter should be in the code, as part of the overall package of what we are trying to deliver. I am not trying to stifle the proposal, and I am more than happy to meet her between stage 2 and stage 3 in order to clarify that.