The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2160 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
We will just have to work on making that relationship work better. Right now, all the evidence that I am seeing and all the engagement that I have had show that, by and large, there is a good working relationship between the deer management groups and NatureScot. There will, of course, be conflict—we cannot avoid having some disputes about certain areas—but, by and large, there is a general degree of trust that I hope that we will continue to build on.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
It will not be anywhere near the end of the process—the end of the process will be much further down the line. It is at the start of a process that NatureScot has previously instigated by trying to communicate beforehand.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
No, it will not come as a surprise. If somebody has received a five-day notice, NatureScot will already have made contact with them to say that it has a concern and that it would like to have a conversation. If it gets blanked or refused, it will come back and say, “Right, we need to have this conversation now.”
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
Yes. The important thing is that the order stays with the land, and that is as it should be.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
No, we would keep it as a control scheme at that stage, because people can say anything that they like. The proof of the pudding is in the eating, when they actually come in and start carrying out the measures that are required.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
If NatureScot were to de-escalate a control scheme and the new owner said that they would carry that out and then did not comply, NatureScot would be back to square 1. It would land back on the minister’s desk to be signed off, and so on. If the order stays with the land, the process is there. It is not about the individual; it is about the landscape-scale management of the deer in the area. If a control scheme stays in place, it is actually an incentive for the people who are selling their land to make sure that they have deer management in place. You generally do not sell an estate at the drop of a hat. If that is one of the preparations that a person has to do to make sure that there is no deer order on their estate, that would be a good thing from their point of view.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
It would be far beyond my remit to give advice on how people should sell their land. I will leave that thought with you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
We will have a look at that. Ross Ewing raised that in a previous evidence session, in relation to situations where you can see or hear somebody. Let us consider what that means, and we will flesh that out.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
The public interest will have to be set out in the code of practice in the individual circumstances.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
Yes. I understand that there is a desire for clarity on the meaning of the term “public interest” in that context. The right place to do that is the code of practice and not in secondary legislation.