The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4572 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
There will be a division.
For
Dowey, Sharon (South Scotland) (Con)
Kerr, Liam (North East Scotland) (Con)
Against
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Mackay, Rona (Strathkelvin and Bearsden) (SNP)
Macpherson, Ben (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (SNP)
Nicoll, Audrey (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP)
Abstentions
Clark, Katy (West Scotland) (Lab)
McNeill, Pauline (Glasgow) (Lab)
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
There will be a division.
For
Dowey, Sharon (South Scotland) (Con)
Kerr, Liam (North East Scotland) (Con)
Against
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Mackay, Rona (Strathkelvin and Bearsden) (SNP)
Macpherson, Ben (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (SNP)
Nicoll, Audrey (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP)
Abstentions
Clark, Katy (West Scotland) (Lab)
McNeill, Pauline (Glasgow) (Lab)
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The next group is on communication supporters for jurors. Amendment 233, in the name of Karen Adam, is the only amendment in the group.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The first group is on jury size and verdicts. Amendment 146, in the name of the cabinet secretary, is grouped with amendments 147, 72 to 74, 92, 148 to 150 and 268. I point out that, if amendments 74 or 92 are agreed to, I cannot call amendments 148, 149 and 158, due to pre-emption.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 4, Abstentions 2.
Amendment 26 disagreed to.
Section 37 agreed to.
Section 38—Jurisdiction and competence: general
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I call Sharon Dowey to move or not move amendment 27, in the name of Russell Findlay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The question is, that amendment 26 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The minister’s update is welcome, including her announcement on the new four-bed national secure care provision at Rossie.
More broadly, it is vital that care and justice services for children continue to be informed by the views of care-experienced children. Can the minister say any more about the steps that the Government is taking to ensure that young people’s voices are at the heart of its work?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Absolutely no one wants survivors to have to wait any longer than is necessary for a court transcript. I hope that that issue can be resolved as part of the evaluation of the pilot.
I welcome the commitment by the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs to work with me and others ahead of stage 3 of the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill on making the provision of access to transcripts permanent within the terms of the on-going pilot. However, I am a little concerned about the implications of another external evaluation for further progress on the pilot. Can the cabinet secretary outline how such an evaluation could impact the progress of the pilot?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I thank Michael Matheson for bringing the debate to the chamber. It is a really important topic and has been looked at by the Criminal Justice Committee, of which I am a member. On the point about awareness, I highlight the issue of county lines, whereby young people—often, children—are recruited by gangs to participate in illegal drug-related activities. That issue is perhaps flying slightly under the radar in Scotland.