The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4360 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Will the cabinet secretary set out what the main and most damaging points of Brexit have been for Scotland, particularly with regard to the fish processing sector in the north-east, and how, if at all, the agreement that has been reached will ameliorate those harms? Does he agree that, in the extremely uncertain economic and geopolitical environment that we currently live in, it is vital that Scotland has the security, stability and opportunity that comes with membership of the European Union through independence?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Continuing on that theme, will the cabinet secretary advise how the Scottish biodiversity strategy will build on the steps that Scotland has already taken to address the biodiversity crisis, with particular regard to Scotland’s rivers, which are crucial to our environment and face the triple impact of more intensive flood events, drought events and rising temperatures?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I welcome the minister’s statement and her consistent engagement with the Parliament and the Criminal Justice Committee on the issue. She has been clear before that the issue is not unique to Scotland and is complex. Will the minister therefore set out how our multi-agency approach in Scotland is bringing partners together in supporting the principles of getting it right for every child?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Chris, do you have a view on the emotional toll on victims and the impact on their wellbeing?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. Are members agreed that we will highlight those points? We are aware that a statement is forthcoming later this week, during which some of the points may be covered.
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Does anybody want to come in on that—perhaps Stuart Houston or Chris Ulliott?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I am sure that members will be keen to come back to you to explore the human impact of cybercrime. I will bring in Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the 15th meeting in 2025 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have received no apologies this morning, and Katy Clark joins us online.
Our first agenda item is to consider whether to take items 4 and 5, which are a review of evidence and consideration of a draft report, in private. Are we agreed to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Our main item of business is an evidence session on the challenges facing business and vulnerable individuals in Scotland from the threat of cybercrime. The session will not cover elements of child exploitation, as the focus will be on businesses and individuals that are at risk of being targeted by cybercriminals.
As we are all aware, cybercrime is becoming more prevalent and sophisticated every year. Its victims are across our society and range from vulnerable individuals to small, medium and large-scale business, as well as public and voluntary sector bodies. The aim of this session is to inform parliamentary debate on the issue by hearing from those who are at the coalface of responding to cybercrime. I hope that we will gain insights into the methods and impacts of cybercrime, what we are likely to face in the coming years, and what more the Parliament and Government can do to help to keep Scotland safe from that threat.
I am pleased to welcome our witnesses. We are joined by Adam Stachura, associate director of policy, communications and external affairs at Age Scotland; David Keenan, chief information officer at Arnold Clark; Jude McCorry, chief executive of the Cyber and Fraud Centre Scotland; Nicola Taylor, member of the CyberScotland Partnership; Miles Bonfield, deputy director at the National Crime Agency; Chris Ulliott, head of cybersecurity at NatWest; and Assistant Chief Constable Stuart Houston, who is with Police Scotland’s organised crime and counterterrorism intelligence division.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2 and thank all the organisations that provided us with written evidence in advance of our meeting. I intend to allow up to two hours for the session.
I begin with a general question to get us started. For ease, I will ask Jude McCorry to respond first. I will then go to Miles Bonfield and ACC Stuart Houston to set the scene. Cybercrime is a vast topic, and we probably all know someone who has been targeted or who works in an organisation that has been affected. What are the most significant risks facing individuals such as the elderly or vulnerable people? What are the most significant risks for businesses? How might cybercrime develop in the coming years?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Those are fascinating and eye-watering numbers.