The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3844 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I am sure that what you have been outlining will come up in further questioning, so I will move to my second question, which relates specifically to section 1, on the purchase of a sexual act. In his evidence, Detective Superintendent Bertram emphasised the key point on
“understanding when the crime would be complete”,
noting that
“Whatever legislation comes in needs to be effective for policing.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 5 November 2025; c 3.]
Putting my former—police—hat on, I completely agree with that. I am looking at this from the perspective of whether section 1 sets out an offence that police officers can use effectively, and I have some concerns about that.
Will you talk us through how you envisage section 1 being complete, so to speak, when it comes to the range of scenarios that are covered by the section 1 offence? I suppose that I am asking what threshold of evidence police officers would be expected to obtain to prove that an offence was complete.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
As there are no further questions, our next item of business is the consideration of a motion to approve the affirmative SSI on which we have just taken oral evidence.
Motion moved,
That the Criminal Justice Committee recommends that the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (Notification Requirements) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2025 [draft] be approved.—[Angela Constance]
Motion agreed to.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you—that is a helpful clarification.
My final question relates to climate change. All committees have been exploring that in scrutinising efforts and arrangements to reduce carbon emissions across their portfolios. In the justice sector, the issue is highly relevant to prisons, policing and the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service.
Will you outline the work that the Government is undertaking to model and deliver the resource that is needed to allow justice stakeholders to deliver on climate targets for the rest of the decade? What sort of achievable targets does the Government want to set specifically for the justice sector in the first carbon budget, which will cover the 2026-30 period? That is in the context of achieving our stated aim of a 57 per cent reduction in emissions from 1990 levels. There is a wee bit in that question, and it might be something that you can outline in a written follow-up response.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We move to questions from Pauline McNeill.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Rona Mackay will then come in with a supplementary.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I think that we have got the gist of it. I was not expecting quite that amount of detail—but that is helpful. The committee has been made aware that, while it might not quite be a pick and mix, some legislation is utilised while some of it is not. I am thinking about how we might consolidate a lot of it, with consideration to the provisions of the bill. I am interested in what legislation exists already and what the thinking is around the future of that existing legislation—and in how it would work alongside the provisions of the bill, should it be enacted. That was a helpful update.
We have a wee bit of time, and I do not know whether any other committee members want to come in. If not, I invite Ash Regan to speak at this point.
10:45Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you—that is an interesting update, in particular with regard to orders for lifelong restriction. I know that it relates to the budget, but I think that, separately, we would be interested to hear a wee bit more about the pathway project by way of follow-up.
That has been helpful to understand the situation. I will open up to questions from members.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I think that the date is in your submission. Perhaps that can be clarified.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Where we are coming from in particular is the fact that there is a great opportunity in the new estate development but also the need to understand the challenges associated with the older parts of the estate. If there is a requirement for additional funding resource to allow you to keep the older parts of the estate wind and watertight—never mind to reduce their carbon emissions—it is important to know what the cost implications of that might be. That goes back to Liam Kerr’s question whether the costs would be met within the additional amount of £40 million that you are seeking and which was quoted earlier.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. It is helpful to understand that.
If there are no more questions from members, we will draw our evidence session to a close; it has been really helpful, so thank you very much indeed for joining us.
That concludes the public part of our meeting. We will now move into private session.
12:05 Meeting continued in private until 13:00.