Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 4789 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee

Correspondence

Meeting date: 7 September 2022

Audrey Nicoll

I agree with your assumption that that would not be considered as part of the centralisation process. That issue might come up in the Bail and Release from Custody (Scotland) Bill.

Criminal Justice Committee

Correspondence

Meeting date: 7 September 2022

Audrey Nicoll

On that note, Stephen Imrie has reminded me that we have already started to seek some of that information. You have raised a good point. Another option is to have a follow-up to the session on policing and mental health, in order to consider that session and other issues that have been raised. Do members agree to that?

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 September 2022

Audrey Nicoll

Agenda item 2 is consideration of a negative Scottish statutory instrument. I refer members to paper 1.

The SSI adds

“A United Kingdom photocard driving licence”

as a valid form of identification for the purposes of a defence to two new criminal offences under the Offensive Weapons Act 2019 operating in Scotland. The two offences are, first, an offence under section 39 relating to a delivery company delivering bladed products, sold by a UK-based seller, to a person aged under 18 at residential premises; and, secondly, an offence under section 42 relating to a delivery company that has entered into an arrangement with a seller that is based outside the UK to deliver a bladed article to a person under 18.

As there are no questions, are members content not to make any recommendation to the Parliament on the instrument?

Members indicated agreement.

Criminal Justice Committee

Correspondence

Meeting date: 7 September 2022

Audrey Nicoll

Absolutely. Are members happy with that?

Members indicated agreement.

Criminal Justice Committee

Correspondence

Meeting date: 7 September 2022

Audrey Nicoll

I see that no one else has any other comments.

Thank you for those helpful views. Based on my professional experience, I absolutely agree that the historical rationale for cross-border placements probably made sense at the time, but we are now in 2022 and our thinking has moved on. It is definitely a real issue.

Jamie Greene referred to the children’s care and justice bill that was mentioned in the programme for government yesterday. Do members agree that we should come back to the issue, perhaps in the autumn, once we can see where the bill is going? In the meantime, we can flag our interest to the lead committee and to the Parliamentary Bureau when the bill is published. Are members happy with that proposal?

Members indicated agreement.

Criminal Justice Committee

Correspondence

Meeting date: 7 September 2022

Audrey Nicoll

Our next letter is correspondence from Martyn Evans, who is the chair of the Scottish Police Authority, about changes to the police pension scheme. There is also an associated letter from David Page, who is the deputy chief officer at Police Scotland. Again, I will open up the floor to comments. The letters were in relation to some correspondence from us requesting an update on progress around the impact of the pension scheme changes.

Criminal Justice Committee

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 7 September 2022

Audrey Nicoll

A very good morning to everyone. I welcome members and staff back from summer recess and to the 23rd meeting in 2022 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have received apologies from Pauline McNeill.

Agenda item 1 is a decision on taking business in private. Do we agree to take items 4 and 5 in private?

Members indicated agreement.

Criminal Justice Committee

Correspondence

Meeting date: 7 September 2022

Audrey Nicoll

Thanks very much.

Like everybody else, I welcome the announcement. I think that it moves Scotland’s judicial system in the right direction, which is a very good thing. Obviously, the next steps will be around the bill. Jamie Greene is right to say that the issue of removing not proven will be a lot of work and will surely require a review of jury majorities and possibly corroboration, too. We will wait and see what comes forward in the bill and monitor that content. Thank you very much for those points, Jamie.

Our third letter is from the Minister for Drugs Policy on the new national drugs mission oversight group. Do members have any comments on that correspondence?

Criminal Justice Committee

Correspondence

Meeting date: 7 September 2022

Audrey Nicoll

The only thing that I would mention is that we are reviewing this and other issues to do with prisons in our action plan. We can expect discussion of access to activities for remand prisoners to be covered in the passage of the Bail and Release from Custody (Scotland) Bill, but we can certainly monitor the issues of fresh air and purposeful activity as part of our wider work. I think that it is appropriate that we do that.

The next piece of correspondence is also from the Scottish Prison Service and it concerns the issuing of medical slips to prisoners on release. Do members have any comments?

Criminal Justice Committee

Correspondence

Meeting date: 7 September 2022

Audrey Nicoll

I agree entirely. We should follow up the letter. It is more an operational delivery issue, so I am minded to suggest that we write to the chief medical officer and ask for information about what changes and improvements can be made. The issue has been raised with the committee on more than one occasion. I think that it was raised during our visit to the Wise Group and the new women’s custody unit in Glasgow.

It is a question of who we write to—I propose that we start with the chief medical officer and ask for some appropriate information.