The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3974 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that. The only point that I would make is that this is the first time that we have revisited the action plan. I like the document visually, and I think that it is helpful for the public in allowing them to go in and get a broad idea of where we—parliamentarians, the Government and others—are in relation to various issues. This is a changing document, and I hope that its colours will change over time but, at this stage, I am comfortable with where we are. However, it is helpful to hear members’ comments and suggestions so that we can make the document as useful and as valuable as possible.
Pauline, did you want to come in?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Audrey Nicoll
That is not clear and perhaps that should be part of the request that we send to the Lord President.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Paper 4 covers the next two instruments—SSI 2022/79 and SSI 2022/80. Does members have any comments to make? If not, we will consider the SSIs as coming into force.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Moving on to page 8, I have to say that what jumped out at me was the issue of residential rehabilitation and “funding for improved provision”.
Back in March, there was a debate in Parliament on a person-centred, trauma-informed public health approach to substance use in the justice system. Reference was made to funding support and plans for residential rehabilitation. We might be able to provide an update on that in the plan.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Okay—thank you.
We have already spoken about purposeful activity, so we will move on to page 11. We have spoken a little bit about the misuse of drugs and the criminal justice system already.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Audrey Nicoll
If there is nothing else on victims’ rights, we will move on to “Reducing youth offending”.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Audrey Nicoll
That is my recollection, as well, so I would not disagree with that.
I am conscious of the time, so I will keep us moving through the document. We are up to page 18—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Audrey Nicoll
I am certainly aware of the recent media coverage, and the inferred link between the two issues. It is probably appropriate for us to monitor that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Okay. That is a point that we can easily take away. Thank you very much. Jamie?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Audrey Nicoll
That brings us to the end of our discussion of the action plan. I appreciate everyone’s comments.
Before we leave this agenda item, I turn to paragraphs 11 to 13 of paper 2. Do members agree that we should take forward those suggestions? They include the suggestion from the survivor we met, whom Jamie Greene spoke about earlier, who suggested that we should raise with the Lord President the issue of the fees that are charged for accessing court records. Do members agree to pick that up and take it forward?
Members indicated agreement.