The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3926 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. Before I open up questioning to members, I will come in on the final point that you made with regard to the Crown Office and the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service. We are aware that the approach has been developed with their involvement. Will you expand a little on their views on the SSI and whether it will meet their needs? Obviously, it will, but what about beyond the timescale that we are looking at today?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
As there are no further questions, we move to our next item of business, which is formal consideration of the negative instrument that we have discussed. Are members content to make no recommendations in relation to the instrument and for it to come into force?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I thank the cabinet secretary and Mr Down for their attendance. We will have a brief pause while we have a changeover of witnesses.
10:11 Meeting suspended.Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
To ask the Scottish Government what engagement it has had with stakeholders regarding the tall ships races Aberdeen 2025. (S6O-04583)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The tall ships races event is set to be a major event for Aberdeen and the north-east, with projections of around 400,000 visitors and an estimated £30 million boost to the local economy. The event will support businesses across the hospitality, retail and tourism sectors and it will support wider community engagement, such as sail training for young people. Hosting the tall ships will also enhance Aberdeen’s international reputation as a vibrant, welcoming city and help to secure a lasting legacy for major events.
Will the minister further outline how the Scottish Government is promoting Scotland’s reputation as a leading events destination, maximising the opportunities that are presented by events such as the tall ships races that will ensure a lasting positive impact on the region and across Scotland?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Absolutely—thank you for that helpful suggestion.
We have covered some action points, but are there any further action points that members wish to suggest, or are we content with where we are? As there are no further comments, we move into private session.
10:10 Meeting continued in private until 10:39.Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that suggestion. The cabinet secretary provided the cross-committee group with an initial response, which formed part of our scrutiny at the cross-committee group. However, it is a helpful suggestion that we consolidate the Government’s position on the recommendations, so I am happy to take that away as an action point. We can come back with a written update on the recommendations, aligned with the work that has already been completed or is already under way—and which the Scottish Government has already provided an update on—along with the outstanding work that you have referenced. I am happy to pull that together for the committee.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Super. On that basis, is the committee agreed to make no recommendations on the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Our next item of business is the consideration of a paper on the recommendations of the recent people’s panel on drug harm and deaths. I refer members to paper 2.
As members will be aware, a people’s panel is a form of public engagement that brings together a randomly selected and broadly representative sample of the population to consider and discuss an issue and make recommendations. The Scottish Parliament held a people’s panel on tackling drug deaths and harm over two weekends in October and November 2024. Two additional online sessions were held in November 2024. A summary of the panel process and its outcomes is set out in paper 2.
I invite members to comment on the report that the people’s panel has produced. On behalf of members of the committee, I extend my thanks to all the participants who took part in the people’s panel, as well as the parliamentary staff who organised it. I know that it involved a great deal of planning and logistics work. Having attended a couple of the panel’s sessions, I know that those were great opportunities for the public to come together on an issue that we are well aware of.
Is the committee content to note that the recommendation for an inquiry into drug use in prisons is now being taken forward by us—the Criminal Justice Committee—and that we invite the Parliament’s participation and communities team to let the panel participants know that the recommendation is now being implemented?
Members indicated agreement.