The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4406 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The £60 million national acquisition plan that was announced this summer looks set to accelerate the Scottish Government’s work to get people and families out of temporary accommodation and into a space that they can call their own. Will the minister provide an update on the roll-out of the fund and the work that is being done with experts and local government to ensure that it is effective?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I am pleased to speak in the debate. At the outset of my contribution, I pay tribute to all our military personnel who have committed to making the ultimate sacrifice to defend our freedom, to our veterans commissioner, and to all the organisations that support our armed forces and the veteran community. I pay particular tribute to the charity Support Our Paras.
I will focus on two areas: education and employment. Earlier this summer I had the pleasure of meeting Associate Research Professor Gerri Matthews-Smith of the centre for military research, education and public engagement at Edinburgh Napier University to discuss the findings of her report entitled “You’re In Your Own Time Now: Understanding Current Experiences of Transition to Civilian Life in Scotland”. Among the issues that are explored in the report is access to education. It notes that, despite the advantages that result from academic qualifications, veterans do not often pursue such a pathway. I am therefore pleased that an articulation mechanism has been developed with the University of Strathclyde to allow those with a higher national diploma qualification to enter initial teacher education. I am also pleased that the Scottish Government continues to develop the Service Children’s Progression Alliance to support service children to access higher and further education.
Separately, though, I am aware that access to education for spouses and partners is challenging where service personnel have enlisted in England but are now based in Scotland. In those circumstances, a partner who wishes to study in Scotland is not entitled to have their fees paid. Although I understand the circumstances of the restriction, bearing in mind that families play a vital role in facilitating successful transitions, I am interested in any update that the minister might be able to provide on options for considering the issue further.
I turn to the role of veterans in the energy sector. Energy companies increasingly recognise the benefits of recruiting men and women from the armed forces, and they can offer them a range of employment opportunities. Qualities such as team leadership, organisational skills and technological knowledge are all highly prized by the sector. Career opportunities exist in the fields of engineering, project management, health and safety, and the skilled trades. To meet its future commitments, the sector is already working to match industry job profiles with military roles, and to identify transferable positions and, importantly, training and conversion opportunities. I am pleased that—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I want to bring in Ann Marie Cocozza, who has not yet had an opportunity to comment, by asking a broad question. What are your views on the proposals for a commissioner?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
John Swinney and Rona Mackay have follow-up questions. Please be succinct.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I am watching the time. We must move on to look at parts 2 and 3 of the bill. I invite members to ask questions on part 2, which is on embedding trauma-informed practice.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I bring in Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Since no one else wants to come in on special measures, I will open the questioning more generally, to get the views of Graham O’Neill and Bill Scott on the provisions. Does part 3 of the bill sufficiently strengthen the protections that are available to vulnerable witnesses in the civil court space?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
If I may—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
We really have to move on. Apologies, Marsha. I will bring Rona Mackay in next.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Audrey Nicoll
We move to part 3, which—you will be glad to hear—is the final part, focusing on special measures for civil cases. We will run up to 11.25.
I will open up the questioning. I direct my first question to Dr Marsha Scott.
Some organisations that have submitted responses, especially those that are supporting individuals with lived experience of the civil justice system, have suggested that the scope of those who are “deemed vulnerable”—in other words, automatically treated as vulnerable—should be broadened. Can you outline your view as to whether part 3 sufficiently strengthens the protection that is available to individuals who are involved in civil court cases?