Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 15 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 4406 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 5 October 2023

Audrey Nicoll

The £60 million national acquisition plan that was announced this summer looks set to accelerate the Scottish Government’s work to get people and families out of temporary accommodation and into a space that they can call their own. Will the minister provide an update on the roll-out of the fund and the work that is being done with experts and local government to ensure that it is effective?

Meeting of the Parliament

Veterans and Armed Forces Community

Meeting date: 5 October 2023

Audrey Nicoll

I am pleased to speak in the debate. At the outset of my contribution, I pay tribute to all our military personnel who have committed to making the ultimate sacrifice to defend our freedom, to our veterans commissioner, and to all the organisations that support our armed forces and the veteran community. I pay particular tribute to the charity Support Our Paras.

I will focus on two areas: education and employment. Earlier this summer I had the pleasure of meeting Associate Research Professor Gerri Matthews-Smith of the centre for military research, education and public engagement at Edinburgh Napier University to discuss the findings of her report entitled “You’re In Your Own Time Now: Understanding Current Experiences of Transition to Civilian Life in Scotland”. Among the issues that are explored in the report is access to education. It notes that, despite the advantages that result from academic qualifications, veterans do not often pursue such a pathway. I am therefore pleased that an articulation mechanism has been developed with the University of Strathclyde to allow those with a higher national diploma qualification to enter initial teacher education. I am also pleased that the Scottish Government continues to develop the Service Children’s Progression Alliance to support service children to access higher and further education.

Separately, though, I am aware that access to education for spouses and partners is challenging where service personnel have enlisted in England but are now based in Scotland. In those circumstances, a partner who wishes to study in Scotland is not entitled to have their fees paid. Although I understand the circumstances of the restriction, bearing in mind that families play a vital role in facilitating successful transitions, I am interested in any update that the minister might be able to provide on options for considering the issue further.

I turn to the role of veterans in the energy sector. Energy companies increasingly recognise the benefits of recruiting men and women from the armed forces, and they can offer them a range of employment opportunities. Qualities such as team leadership, organisational skills and technological knowledge are all highly prized by the sector. Career opportunities exist in the fields of engineering, project management, health and safety, and the skilled trades. To meet its future commitments, the sector is already working to match industry job profiles with military roles, and to identify transferable positions and, importantly, training and conversion opportunities. I am pleased that—

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 October 2023

Audrey Nicoll

I want to bring in Ann Marie Cocozza, who has not yet had an opportunity to comment, by asking a broad question. What are your views on the proposals for a commissioner?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 October 2023

Audrey Nicoll

John Swinney and Rona Mackay have follow-up questions. Please be succinct.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 October 2023

Audrey Nicoll

I am watching the time. We must move on to look at parts 2 and 3 of the bill. I invite members to ask questions on part 2, which is on embedding trauma-informed practice.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 October 2023

Audrey Nicoll

I bring in Rona Mackay.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 October 2023

Audrey Nicoll

Since no one else wants to come in on special measures, I will open the questioning more generally, to get the views of Graham O’Neill and Bill Scott on the provisions. Does part 3 of the bill sufficiently strengthen the protections that are available to vulnerable witnesses in the civil court space?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 October 2023

Audrey Nicoll

If I may—

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 October 2023

Audrey Nicoll

We really have to move on. Apologies, Marsha. I will bring Rona Mackay in next.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 October 2023

Audrey Nicoll

We move to part 3, which—you will be glad to hear—is the final part, focusing on special measures for civil cases. We will run up to 11.25.

I will open up the questioning. I direct my first question to Dr Marsha Scott.

Some organisations that have submitted responses, especially those that are supporting individuals with lived experience of the civil justice system, have suggested that the scope of those who are “deemed vulnerable”—in other words, automatically treated as vulnerable—should be broadened. Can you outline your view as to whether part 3 sufficiently strengthens the protection that is available to individuals who are involved in civil court cases?