The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3844 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We move to questions from Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Before we move on to consider the motion, I am conscious of the fact that we find ourselves in a rather unusual position, in that we have had very short notice of the DPLR Committee’s report in which it outlines its views on the technical aspects of the SSI.
I am content, on the basis of the information that was provided in the papers, and from the questions and answers today, that the policy content of the SSI is sound. However, before we proceed to considering the motion, it is appropriate that I ask whether members wish to continue to do that now. Are members content with what we have discussed and heard in the responses from the cabinet secretary? If not, we would have to defer consideration of the motion to a later date.
In any case, it would clearly be appropriate that we include our views on the DPLR Committee’s consideration of the SSI in the report that we prepare following our consideration of the motion.
As I said, I am content to proceed to consider the motion, but I ask members to indicate whether they, too, are content. I ask members who are content to proceed to raise their hand. I see five members who are in favour of proceeding to consider the motion; the other three are opposed to doing so.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Are members content to delegate responsibility to me and the clerks to approve a short factual report to the Parliament on this affirmative instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The report will be published shortly.
13:01 Meeting continued in private until 13:05.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that.
I have a final question on the point that you made regarding the crime being complete at the point of payment, or evidence of payment or intended payment. That brings to mind the fact that payment can include a transfer between bank accounts or online payment, which are notoriously difficult transactions for police officers to investigate. My question is a practical one: how do you envisage that being enforceable?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That sets the tone for my next question, which relates to the impact of legislation. The committee has scrutinised a range of legislation, including two quite significant bills: the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill and the Bail and Release from Custody (Scotland) Bill, which are both now acts. Do you have an update on the impact of those new pieces of legislation, from a budget perspective? Is the Government in a position to implement all the provisions in those acts, or will regard need to be given to costs, and will the roll-out be cost dependent?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That would be most helpful.
As there are no more questions from members, we will draw the evidence session to a close. Thank you very much for attending, cabinet secretary and officials. We will suspend for a few minutes to allow for a changeover of Government officials.
11:56 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will have to cut you off, I am afraid, because a number of members want to come in. We have had only two members ask questions so far, and we have a lot to get through, so I have to ask for much shorter responses, Ms Regan.
Are you done, Mr Kerr?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I urge witnesses to give succinct responses, just to allow everybody to come in. I bring in Jamie Hepburn.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We turn to the second affirmative instrument. From the Scottish Government, I welcome to the meeting David Doris, who works on prison policy in the community justice division, and Hannah Hutchison, from the legal directorate. I refer members to paper 6.
Before the cabinet secretary gives her opening remarks, I refer members to the comments that were made by the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee at its meeting on Tuesday this week, when it considered the instrument. The DPLR Committee wanted to alert our committee to the fact that it has reported the instrument on the grounds of an “unusual or unexpected use” of the powers conferred by the parent statute. The DPLR Committee is concerned that the instrument makes provision for ministers to make further changes by regulations, and noted that it is unusual for subordinate legislation to grant ministers powers to make further subordinate legislation. I ask the cabinet secretary to cover those points in her opening remarks.
If any member would like to see it, we have a copy of the DPLR Committee’s report, which has just been published. I invite the cabinet secretary to make some opening remarks on the instrument.