The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4525 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Detective Superintendent Brown, do you have any views on that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Pauline McNeill, do you want to come in with any questions beyond the supplementary questions that you asked earlier? If not, I will open up the discussion to any members for final questions. We have a wee bit of time in hand.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Professor Gilchrist, do you want to come in at all?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will pull your response back to the bill. Having outlined that, what are your comments, from a Crown Office perspective, on the notification requirement provision in the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Pauline McNeill wants to come back in, and then I will ask a couple of final questions.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
On the wellbeing of children who are caught up in domestic abuse, as Jamie Hepburn was asking his questions—and I think that this came out in our earlier lines of questioning—I was thinking that parts 1 and 2 of the bill have the potential to impose an additional layer of bureaucracy. Some might consider that that activity could be better used elsewhere in the overall effort to tackle violence against women and girls. That layer of bureaucracy would potentially be placed not only on services and organisations, but on families and, indirectly, children. I am thinking about families in which children are already grappling with getting through daily life, and the potential for registration or for participation in the assessment process for rehabilitation. These are all things that families have to negotiate and insert into their daily lives, at a time when life can already be quite difficult.
I am interested in the witnesses’ views on the extent to which what we are trying to achieve via the bill’s provisions, particularly in parts 1 and 2, could result in unintended negative consequences for families, victims and, in particular, children and their wellbeing. Glyn Lloyd, do you want to come in on that from a social work point of view?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
As no other members have any further questions, I bring in Pam Gosal.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that. That is kind of what I was getting at in my question.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. Glyn Lloyd is indicating that he has nothing more to add on that.
This might have come out in some of your earlier responses—if so, I apologise because I must have missed it—but the committee has heard evidence about MAPPA, which was not designed to be used in relation to domestic abuse offenders. To return to Detective Superintendent Brown and Glyn Lloyd, based on your experience, would MAPPA work to assess managed domestic abuse offenders, as defined in the bill, given that the system is designed to be used to deal with a specific group of offenders?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Those would have to be robustly evidence based.