Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 3 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3844 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 January 2024

Audrey Nicoll

Our next agenda item is consideration of two negative Scottish statutory instruments that relate to the new transgender prisoner policy that we have just been discussing.

I refer members to papers 1 and 2. I remind all members who are present that only committee members can participate in this process. Motions to annul the instruments have been lodged in the name of Russell Findlay. I will invite the committee to dispose of the motions to annul.

I invite Russell Findlay to move motions S6M-11816 and S6M-11817 and to make any brief additional comments that he wishes to make.

Criminal Justice Committee

Management of Transgender Prisoners

Meeting date: 11 January 2024

Audrey Nicoll

I want to move things on, because I want other members to have an opportunity to ask questions.

Criminal Justice Committee

Management of Transgender Prisoners

Meeting date: 11 January 2024

Audrey Nicoll

Can I just ask whether you want to ask the cabinet secretary about that same issue, or is it a different question?

Criminal Justice Committee

Management of Transgender Prisoners

Meeting date: 11 January 2024

Audrey Nicoll

Right.

Criminal Justice Committee

Management of Transgender Prisoners

Meeting date: 11 January 2024

Audrey Nicoll

I call Fulton MacGregor.

Criminal Justice Committee

Management of Sexual Offences Cases

Meeting date: 10 January 2024

Audrey Nicoll

Thank you Lady Dorrian. We appreciate your taking the time to join us this morning. We will now have a short suspension.

10:45 Meeting suspended.  

10:50 On resuming—  

Criminal Justice Committee

Management of Sexual Offences Cases

Meeting date: 10 January 2024

Audrey Nicoll

Thank you—that is helpful. I know that Pauline McNeill wants to come in, so I will ask my final question, which is on the anonymity of victims. The report recommends “express legislative protection” for the anonymity of victims of sexual offences. I am interested in hearing about the reasons for that recommendation. What difference do you think that such protection would make to victims?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 January 2024

Audrey Nicoll

Thank you. I will open up questions to members.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 January 2024

Audrey Nicoll

We move to our next panel, and I welcome to the meeting David Fraser, executive director, and Danielle McLaughlin, head of the Lord Justice Clerk’s review, from the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service. I intend to allow about 40 minutes for this session.

I will open with a general question, and it will come as no surprise that it is about the proposal for a specialist sexual offences court, on which we have already taken quite substantial evidence from the Lord Advocate and Lady Dorrian. Given that the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service has expressed support for the creation of a sexual offences court, will you outline what, in your view, would be the main benefits of such a court as well as some of the challenges that could be faced?

12:15  

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 January 2024

Audrey Nicoll

That was helpful.

Mr Fraser, we asked the Lord Advocate and Lady Dorrian about putting in place a specialist approach in the existing court structure, so, in the spirit of consistency, I note that early in your contribution, you articulated the fact that the current system has two tiers. We have heard it argued that the current system should become more specialised instead of our going to the bother of creating a bespoke court. Is there anything further that you would like to add on that point?