The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1562 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Siobhian Brown
Yes. As I said in my opening statement, we are supportive of the principle, but it is about how we do it and that we get it right.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Siobhian Brown
Yes.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Siobhian Brown
We are currently doing our best to ensure that women are kept safe. We will not do anything or roll out anything that puts women in any further danger.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Siobhian Brown
You are asking me whether the Scottish Government thinks that the international examples of criminalising the purchase of sex are working.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Siobhian Brown
Our equally safe strategy, which was launched in February last year, explicitly states that prostitution is violence against women and girls, and that has helped us with our strategic approach to challenging men’s demand.
The strategy aims to challenge men’s demand and to put in place support for people with experience of commercial sexual exploitation and help them to exit if they wish to do so. It also aims to raise public and professional awareness that women with experience of selling or exchanging sex are victims of exploitation. It highlights the importance of engagement with stakeholders, including people with lived experience, to inform future policy.
Our strategic approach aims to challenge and deter men’s demand for prostitution and improve access to support for women, from crisis support through to longer-term support. That reflects the complexities of the issues that are associated with prostitution and the need for a multifaceted approach.
On the ground, we are currently working with Police Scotland to support the implementation of operation begonia, its new national approach to prostitution, which is designed to route women with experience of commercial sexual exploitation to support services as opposed to their being charged, and involves police more evidently using the powers that are currently available to them to challenge men’s demand.
Operation begonia has been going on in Aberdeen for many years; it is now operating in Dundee and Edinburgh, and in Glasgow under another name. The latest update from Police Scotland on the operation states that there have been more than 114 patrols; that 171 males have been warned and 48 charged; and that there has been in excess of 250 intelligence logs. Importantly, where women consented, 79 men have been referred to support.
That should give you an idea of what is happening. There is a lot more work going on, but that is what we are currently doing with our strategic approach.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Siobhian Brown
To me, women’s safety has to be paramount. In your evidence sessions, and in the discussions that I have had, I have heard women who are currently involved in prostitution expressing genuine fear that they would become more endangered as a result of the provisions in the bill. I do not think that their voices have been in the conversation thus far, and we must have them around the table as we consider this legislation, because it will impact them. If we are to legislate, we must work together on how to do so safely, so that we do not put any women in further danger.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Siobhian Brown
We need more detail on support. If this was a Government bill, you would quite rightly be scrutinising the proposal and asking for detail on how long the support would be provided, whether we would be paying for rent, council tax and childcare, what would happen if the woman chose to go back into prostitution and returned to receive support in three months’ time, and what the timescales were expected to be. Those are the kind of questions that I would expect to be able to answer as a Government minister. If it is to be good legislation that we can vote on and have confidence in, MSPs would need to have detail on how much it would cost and what support would be in place. At this stage, we do not have that detail.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Siobhian Brown
From what I have heard, they could potentially do that. You have heard evidence from women in that regard. I do not want to go into detail about the reasons why that is, because I am sure that you have heard such detail.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Siobhian Brown
We are not looking at that at the moment, no.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Siobhian Brown
Pardoning is complex, and that is why we need to have more engagement. If we did decriminalise—