The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1302 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Obviously, I cannot speak for Liz Smith. I do not know whether that would be something that—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
If a financial resolution is not produced, yes, that is the case.
09:00Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I have continued to engage with Ms Smith. I have had, I think, three meetings with her since stage 1, there have been more than 10 letters of correspondence between us, and I have provided statistical information to her when she has asked for it. We have tried to work with Ms Smith as much as possible.
However, given the significance of the Government’s decision and the affordability issues that have been raised, I thought that it was appropriate to come up with another approach that could be taken, depending on the decision on the financial resolution.
A lot of the work on the pilot approach goes hand in hand with the work that is informing our approach to the member’s bill. We have looked at a number of issues in relation to the pilot approach, and I will perhaps bring in Saskia Kearns or Lewis Hedge to talk about that further. A number of issues are helping to inform our decision on the financial resolution. I do not see the two things in isolation. The work on the pilot approach is helpful in informing the Government’s final decision on the financial resolution.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
That is a very important point. There might be teachers who are simply unable to attend week-long residentials—if they have young children and caring responsibilities, for example. The member raises a relevant point.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
That has not been decided on directly and, in a sense, that pre-empts the decision on the financial resolution. However, that is absolutely the case. Again, it brings us back to some of the unknowns about the costings in the bill. I appreciate that there are a number of avenues for funding this. For example, we know that pupil equity funding covers some of the costs for the children and young people.
We know that local authorities currently pay for children to go on residential trips, but that might not be the case if the bill becomes a statute. A prime example is that when the 1,140 hours was rolled out, there were hefty negotiations about the costings for that. It has to be a key consideration.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I cannot give a figure for the cost. I do not know whether my officials will be able to expand on that.
The process would be the regular process for negotiations between COSLA and local government with the Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers at a later date. However, I cannot attach a cost to the standard process for teacher contract negotiations.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
It is the standard process for contract negotiations between COSLA, local government and the SNCT. Lewis Hedge might be able to expand on that a little further.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Does that not concern you, convener?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
You can look at it in that way if you want, Mr Ross. Alternatively, we can look at it as there being an unknown figure, so it is difficult to understand the full financial implications in order to produce a financial resolution. As I said, I do not want to pre-empt any decision. However, if you took that stance, I would oppose it and provide an alternative view for you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Sorry, Mr Briggs, I did not hear your question.