The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1480 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I have been clear about the safeguards that are available, and I have committed to exploring other potential safeguards with committee members, should they have any to put on the table. As I have said, if you have ideas about specific amendments that could be made to strengthen the provisions further, I would love to hear them.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Mr Briggs and I have discussed kinship care several times, and he knows that I am very committed to improving support and circumstances for kinship carers in general. There are ways to do that in a non-legislative fashion, but there might also be room for legislation. I am exploring what changes could be put in place. It has proved complex, due to some of the factors around kinship care, such as kinship care orders and whether kinship care is informal or formal.
I understand the concerns about kinship care not being included in the bill. The committee might be aware that I am developing a vision for kinship carers, in which I intend to lay out what has been raised with me regarding how to support kinship carers and most effectively improve their experiences. I am still considering that; unfortunately, the timings for the bill did not allow for that work to be included. I have committed to continuing to discuss the issue with Mr Briggs in relation to where I feel that there is room for those non-legislative moves and whether there is room for amendment prior to stage 2.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Time would not have allowed for that, if I wanted to be in a position where I could—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I agree, Mr Ross. I have already touched on that. The figures are specifically in relation to the aftercare point that we have already highlighted. I believe that there is a better way, and that is what we are working through with COSLA at the moment. I have committed to providing any updated financial information to the finance committee, and I will do the same with this committee.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
We might have discussed this separately, but I have been clear about the need for a preventative approach. I have alluded to the issues that can follow a child through their life or that can arise as a result of poor services for adults. I completely appreciate the financial challenges and difficulties that local authorities face, but I would argue that, going forward, there is a need to further invest in the services that we are talking about. It does not necessarily involve a financial ask; it is about joining up approaches, breaking down silos and getting people to work more closely when their services are related. As I have said, and as Iona Colvin said, many local authority areas or IJBs already operate in that way. It is about sharing best practice and understanding whether there are concerns that need to be addressed.
12:45Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Yes, of course.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
There are valid points on affordability that would be of extreme concern to committee members and others if, for example, the bill was a Government bill.
I am trying to emphasise some of the areas that Parliament needs to consider.
If the Government does not provide a financial resolution, the bill will fall—that has been made clear.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I am merely highlighting the Government’s concerns. That is the line of questioning that you are giving me, convener.
As I have already said, the process is not unique to Scotland. The Welsh Government has it, and the UK Government has used it. We are not in a unique position here. I hope that the committee would be graceful given the fact that we are considering the matter fully. We appreciate that the 26 September deadline is near, and I have committed to ensuring that a decision is communicated by that date.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I have given my answer to the convener. I apologise if that was how that came across.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I made clear last night that the matter is subject to on-going consideration and that the Government will consider its position by 26 September. I have made clear that the work that the member in charge has undertaken over recent months and has shared with me, as well as my own engagement and the work that my officials have been undertaking, will be used to inform that.
I should now make clear that this is not a Government-supported bill. There is no formal requirement on the Government to provide support. However, I have continued to engage with Ms Smith and to provide requested information, and I have continued to engage with key bodies. This will go through the normal Cabinet process. I am not able to give any further information on dates, but I assure the committee that the decision will be made and announced prior to 26 September.