The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1522 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
That is the case, Mr Mason—you are absolutely correct. There is a level of complexity here. For a start, work is under way to consider the question that you have just posed to me. Obviously, the consultation on the issue has closed, and I do not think that I can necessarily define what “excessive profits” are at the moment.
As I have said, there is a complexity here, because we know that there could be an element of reinvestment, whether it be in the estate, a centre or whatever. Again, it probably comes back to what I was talking about with regard to regulations. Giving ourselves more time to develop this area further is, I think, very appropriate, because we want to get it right. I know that many people have the right aims at heart when it comes to delivering support for our children and young people, but the whole idea and aim of the bill have come directly from children and young people themselves, who said in the independent care review—and, indeed, have said repeatedly afterwards—that people should not be profiting from their care.
I know that that does not answer your question directly, Mr Mason, but I recognise that there is a level of complexity here, which is currently being considered.
11:30Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
It is just still morning, yes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Yes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
As we have mentioned, they will be in line with the provisions that are already in place under UNCRC and under the getting it right for every child framework, so local authorities already have that responsibility.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Okay, sorry if I misheard your question and went on a different strand. Can you repeat it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Stakeholders have come to me with concerns about ensuring that the register is independent. I do not have a definitive answer, but I can certainly see why that would be the right approach and am considering that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
The issue in that regard is that there is responsibility across a number of fronts to deliver on the Promise. Of course, I am the minister with responsibility for the Promise, so I lead from the front in that respect. However, we have whole-Government effort, local government effort and third sector partners who are working daily to deliver the Promise, so I think that it would be hard to make one person accountable for the entire journey, remembering the time that is involved in that. However, I have been very clear that there is room for more accountability. There are already ways in which we are looking to understand the level of delivery of the Promise across Scotland.
We have aims and targets for what we want to see, and I have already mentioned the inconsistency across Scotland on the different areas of delivery of the Promise. Further work could be done in that regard, but I do not necessarily think that I can put on record in the committee right now who I think should be seen to be accountable for it, because there are a lot of delivery partners across Scotland. However, there are certainly ways in which we could look to increase accountability.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
With regard to some of the guidance and regulations, not just in relation to the definition of “care experience”, but a number of other things—for example, the register of foster carers—there will be opportunities to engage with not only the people who will be impacted but those who might implement aspects of the policy. It will give additional time and flexibility to realise the bill’s aims. As I have said, I do not think that there is always a necessity for specific aspects to be in the bill.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
—but, as I said, we are enhancing and widening access to aftercare, so—