The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1480 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I will bring Gavin Henderson in in a moment, but I see a range of different approaches being taken across the country. Some local authorities already function in that way and they would not need to take next steps, unless we go back to what I said earlier about sharing best practice to show that working differently does not have to make things harder but can make them easier and far more fluent. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to the next steps. A period of working and engagement will be required to find the best way forward for each local area, drawing on the best practice that already exists.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I agree with that to a certain extent, and I think that that comes across in the provisions that we have included in the bill. We understand that, in some situations, there might have to be grounds hearings, but, given the nature of those hearings and the fact that 86 per cent of cases result in an application for proof, we want to reduce their number. The provisions in the bill will help to do that and to take people out of a situation that they should not really be in.
However, as I have said to Sheriff Mackie, I still see grounds hearings being required on certain occasions.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I was provided with the best information that I could be given at the time, and I had to choose between progressing with a bill under the timeline that was given to me or committing to updating that information further. As Gavin and I have alluded to, information was requested from COSLA on a number of different aspects of the bill, and the most efficient and useful figures were not provided in all areas.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Mr Mason, you have rightly highlighted some of the complexities around this issue. I do not believe that it is impossible, and, equally, I do not want to comment on anyone’s specific circumstances, but I appreciate how things can look to children and young people. As I have said, all those factors will be considered as the work progresses.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
As Gavin Henderson alluded to, this is what stakeholders have asked for—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Again, I do not want to put a definitive timescale on it. It is most important that we get this right. The clear response to Mr Mason’s question about why we have taken a different approach is that it is to avoid some of those unintended consequences. I believe that the approach that we are taking is the right one, but it will be developed further. I do not want to put a definitive timescale on it, because I want to give the appropriate amount of time to work through the issues with concerned stakeholders.
As Mr Briggs said, we are not going to see the full effects of the Welsh model, and I have been clear that I want to work with my counterparts to find the best way forward and meet challenges before they arise. That is a fair summary.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
It is best to leave that to local authorities, which are best placed to make decisions for their own areas. As I have said, I know that many local authorities already proactively take that approach by prioritising housing for care leavers. I said in my response to Mr Rennie that I appreciate that there is inconsistency. Again, that is something that I will raise and discuss with the Cabinet Secretary for Housing.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Prioritising housing for care leavers does not necessarily have a cost attached to it. In fact, I would imagine that it would bring savings, because if that did not happen, there could be a breakdown in the person’s situation and they could come into contact with services. Therefore, I do not know whether that is an appropriate stance to take.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Sorry?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Sorry, Mr Rennie. You mentioned funding—what else?