The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1480 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
If you mean in connection with the single-member panel, I believe that I mentioned that in my response to your first question on this area.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
A statutory duty is already placed on local authorities through regulations to support those who are eligible for aftercare and to provide them with suitable accommodation. The decision should be assessed based on the young person’s needs. Underpinning that approach is the Government’s guidance on aftercare, corporate parenting, social housing allocations and the homelessness code, which together set out the need to take a prioritised and tailored response to ensure that young people move on from care.
Work is on-going on that. We seek to further improve young people’s care experience by finding appropriate housing. Our focus is on progressing the recommendations of the “Improving Care Leavers Housing Pathways” report. A prevention and strategy group is being set up, led by Kate Polson, chief executive officer of the Rock Trust, which Mr Rennie will be aware of. I will soon meet the Cabinet Secretary for Housing to discuss that work. I am aware that she is coming to the Cabinet sub-committee to provide an update on the priorities for improving care-experienced people’s experiences when it comes to accessing housing.
A number of work strands are under way to improve those experiences. Many local authorities have powers to prioritise care-experienced people’s housing needs, and many already use them. The powers are used in different ways, so I want to see a little more consistency, which I will look at going forward. I hope that that answers some of the member’s concerns.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I did not ask the Cabinet Secretary for Housing about this issue specifically—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Mr Ross, you are not giving full credit to the complexity of introducing a Government bill. As I said, I have to consider a range of factors around what will be in a bill and how we gather the data for that. There was no thought of, “We’ll put this in the bill and then consult after.” It was very much about the timescales involved in introducing the bill prior to summer recess. That was my focus. I can only apologise again if we have not given the committee the fullest of answers in relation to that specific aspect of the bill.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I will engage with and work on those concerns, and we will discuss and work through them as we analyse the consultation response and work to build on those aspects of the bill.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Mr Ross knows that I take a keen interest in financial memorandums. We have discussed them at length with this committee.
In a second I will bring in Gavin Henderson to speak to the engagement side, but I think that it comes back to the complexity around many of the measures. The bill has various aspects and provisions, and efforts have been made to engage on specific aspects. I admit that there is a level of complexity in refining the figures, but, from my side, there have been active attempts to engage and find the most appropriate financial figures to provide to the committee.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
The Government is seeking to tackle that from a wider perspective. We want to progress engagement with the United Kingdom Government to explore the removal of the legislative restrictions that currently limit our ability to enhance human rights protections across areas that are devolved to Scotland. However, if that engagement does not prove successful by November 2026, the Government will seek a more straightforward and effective route to extending protection for children’s rights by commissioning a review of the provisions in the acts of Parliament of the UK that affect devolved areas to identify key provisions that interact with children’s rights.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
The difference between the two relates to the fact that, under the Public Services Reform (Scotland) Act 2010, independent fostering agencies are already required to operate on a not-for-profit basis; no such restrictions currently apply to the residential side of things. Only a small number—nine out of 26—of independent fostering agencies are not yet charities.
Gavin Henderson spoke about destabilising provision. I think that there is less risk of that on the fostering agency side. At the moment, 48 per cent of residential services are run by private providers so, if those two measures were applied in the same way immediately, there would be a higher risk of losing placements or providers exiting the market. The proposal reflects a more balanced approach. I think that we could still get there with the residential side, but that approach reflects a more timely and safer way of doing so, to ensure that we do not lose out on placements.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Yes, I am confident of that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I will need to bring Barry McCaffrey in to speak to that directly.