The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1522 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Mr Briggs can correct me if I have picked up his question wrongly but, at the moment, I am not considering any further amendments in relation to housing under the Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill. Amendments to the Housing (Scotland) Bill were passed that will impact on care-experienced young people, such as the duty to ask and act. That is not to say that this is a closed book, in that work is on-going in relation to the recommendations in “Improving Care Leavers Housing Pathways”. That continues to be a priority, despite it not necessarily being in the bill before us.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
No. It would lead to duplication and unnecessary complexity if we were to do so. However, I have heard the concerns that have been raised. I am committed to UNCRC and I am getting advice on it, so if I find a way forward that combats those issues, I will act on it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
That highlights the importance of advocacy and the question of who would be there to support the child. The offer of advocacy will now be made at an earlier point. The provisions will open up opportunities to streamline the system to make it more effective for children and young people. I can certainly consider ways to avoid those concerns from arising. Perhaps, if it is a fear among children and young people, we can try to appease them. However, I believe that the provisions will have more benefits than negative impacts.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Data suggests that the position is a little bit more nuanced than that. I do not think that you can necessarily say, “The public sector sits here, and the private sector sits over there, and over there is better.” Again, it needs to be seen on a case-by-case basis, and we really need to delve into that a little further.
As for the work that is under way, I might bring in Gavin Henderson to respond to the more specific points that you have raised, but, as I have said, there is a clear ambition to remove profit—or excessive profit—from the system. Likewise, similar efforts with the same aims are going on across the UK, and we will work with our counterparts to explore the challenges and complexities arising in those systems.
Gavin, can you speak to some of the points that Mr Mason has raised?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
That is exactly what I am receiving advice about. Ms Duncan-Glancy knows that I am more than happy to discuss different aspects of the bill. I am more than happy to continue conversations around that point specifically, once I have received fuller advice in relation to amendments for stage 2.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
North Yorkshire is not a country, whereas we are delivering legislation that is Scotland-wide. We provide the powers for local authorities to be able to enhance their support further if they wish to do so, which is the decision that North Yorkshire Council has very admirably taken. I am more than happy to look into its successes. However, I point to the differences: we are speaking about passing legislation on a countrywide basis, which is different from a local authority taking the decision to further enhance the support.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I have the number 147 in my head, but that might be a different consultation—I am dealing with five at the moment. We will follow that up. I am pretty sure that I can confirm that it is definitely not 1,000.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Yes. I am talking about what would have happened if we had chosen to consult prior to the introduction. There is a timescale involved in arranging consultations, then consulting and then carrying out the analysis that has to follow.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
The decisions were not taken at the same time. As I said, I had to consider a range of factors in relation to what would be in the bill and the appropriate timescales for those. I am very clear that the timescales would not have allowed for a consultation to have been undertaken prior to the introduction of the bill.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I am not necessarily going to put yeses or nos on the record in response to these questions, because, as Ms Duncan-Glancy will be aware, I will be receiving advice on what are complex matters. Therefore, I do not want to say yes or no, because a range of different circumstances and complexities could be involved that could mean that that might be okay sometimes, and sometimes not. If we want to get into a fuller discussion on these matters, it will be much more helpful if we take it out of the committee space and if I can, as I have committed to doing, discuss amendments with all members ahead of stage 2.