The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1344 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Ben Higgins, I come to you on those two questions on guidance and on the UNCRC definition.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
That is a good point, and it has got me thinking of another question. Kate Sanger talked about the level of expertise in schools, and about training. I am in East Lothian, where we have a number of schools in a geographically tight area. Some schools have an area of expertise that means that kids from all over East Lothian go there and the teachers also get more training. It is important to get a balance between what is provided at local authority level and what happens in each individual town, because parents and children might have to travel. Suzi, what are your thoughts on that?
Kate spoke about focusing on training, but are we spreading that too thinly? Should we try to have specific schools that have expertise in dealing with kids who have learning disabilities until that training is in place? I ask Kate and Suzi for their thoughts on that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Submissions to the committee have called for clarity around proposals for guidance on care experience. Are the proposals effective enough? The Promise Scotland and the Children and Young People’s Commissioner raised concerns about the privacy of care-experienced people in relation to the proposal. You mentioned the number of care-experienced people you have supported, and the issue is also relevant to my professional background and that of some of my colleagues. What are your thoughts on the issue, and how might the proposals be improved?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Do you think that the regulations should be set out in the bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
My question is on some general points. Who Cares? Scotland, The Promise Scotland and the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland commented on the drafting of sections 1 and 2, on aftercare. Laura Pasternak, you mentioned that issue, as well as the issue of section 10’s amendment of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 in relation to the register of foster carers. Of course, the 1995 act is pre-devolution UK legislation that falls outwith the scope of the UNCRC, as you noted. What are your views on how that section has been drafted, and what might be done at stage 2 to bring it into scope?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I am not sure how to follow that.
I have a more general question about the UNCRC, which Lynne O’Brien touched on. Several respondents have commented on the drafting of sections 1 and 2, on aftercare, and section 10, on the register of foster carers, which amend the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. As that is pre-devolution UK legislation, it falls outwith the scope of the UNCRC.
What are your views on that small but important point? Significant issues could be created if we do not get that aspect right. I will come to Lynne first, as she raised the issue.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I do not know whether anyone else wants to address that point, which is an important one.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
How can the Scottish Government ensure that the provisions have a positive impact on care-experienced people, and how do you suggest that work to decide on the definition should be progressed? Like George Adam, I was a councillor for 15 years, and as an MSP, I have met care-experienced youngsters and those going through transition. There is a real issue around what support they have and how much they are listened to as care-experienced people. Some of them have been in the system for a year, some have been in the system for five or 10 years, but they gave strong feedback that they are not being listened to more broadly.
You mentioned earlier broadening out the definition of care. From your experience, what lessons can be learned, and what are your views?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Jo Derrick, what are your thoughts on the aftercare point that Duncan Dunlop has just made? I asked also about the definition of care experience, but the aftercare point is also really important. I know that we have had previous discussions about that, but what are your thoughts on the bill and on that point?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
That is a really important point, and it goes right through this issue. Natalie, do you want to add anything?