The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1344 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Let us move on to part 2 of the bill, which introduces an exemption for a situation in which a public authority is compelled to act incompatibly with the UNCRC’s requirements. What is your view of the Scottish Government’s reasoning for including the further exemption to the compatibility duty? The witnesses have partly answered that question. I do not know whether anyone wants to add anything specifically about the compatibility duty and part 2 of the bill.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Fraser, I will come to you first. We have talked about rights under the UNCRC, the compatibility duty in the bill, and the Scottish Government’s reasoning for the further exemption from that duty in part 2 of the bill. You have touched on that already. Do you have anything to add on that point?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Alejandro, do you have anything to add?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
You have all touched on the UNCRC. I know that the UNCRC provisions are in part 2, but it is relevant to the other question that I asked, too. Does anyone else want to come in and pick up the UNCRC point specifically? We heard about that from witnesses on the previous two panels.
I ask Caitlin Fitzgerald to respond specifically on the UNCRC point and on the general question as well. Angela O’Hagan can come in, too. It seems to be a rolling theme in all our evidence sessions so far.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I welcome the witnesses to the meeting.
I want to ask about some of the specifics. My question is kind of in three parts. The bill requires a school to inform a child if their parent asks for them to be withdrawn from religious observance or RME. When that request has been made, the child is given an opportunity to express their views and the school has to seek a discussion with the child and parent. I would like to hear your thoughts on that and on the fact that a school must respect the child’s wishes, even if their view differs from that of their parent.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Does anyone else want to come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I want to move on to something a bit more specific. It is a three-part question. I do not know whether you heard the questions that I asked the previous panel, but it will be similar to those. It is about the requirement for schools to inform a child if the parent asks for them to be withdrawn from RO or RME. When a request has been made, the child is given an opportunity to express their views. The school must seek a discussion with the child and parent, and the school must respect the child’s wishes if their view differs from that of their parents.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Alejandro Sanchez, what are your thoughts?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Does anyone else want to come in on that particular point?