Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 15 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2076 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 27 November 2024

Michelle Thomson

I thank the minister for her response and I recognise the progress that has been made thus far. However, people who are seeking a diagnosis still find it difficult to obtain one because the pathways for adults are complex and sometimes restrictive. Those who are fortunate enough to be able to afford a private diagnosis are then unable to receive treatment on the NHS, because health boards state that they have difficulty in determining the quality or veracity of assessments that are undertaken in the private sector.

I appreciate that health boards are responsible for developing their own pathways. However, given that independent clinics are regulated by Healthcare Improvement Scotland, does the minister consider that health boards could or should be open to accepting private diagnoses from regulated clinics in order to relieve the pressure on NHS waiting lists?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2025-26 (United Kingdom Context)

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Michelle Thomson

I want to return to the subject of growth and the link with capital. I think that it was David Miles who reminded us that, on capital, we have a short-term bounce of about 2.5 per cent. There was a lot of sleight of hand in the budget in relation to the short-term nearside position but, in the longer term, capital investment will continue to be very low. How on earth will we be able in any way to mitigate—if we can mitigate it at all—the damage of Brexit over the longer term, given that, as we have discussed throughout this meeting, we have had only marginal nearside increases?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2025-26 (United Kingdom Context)

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Michelle Thomson

I was about to say, “Always look on the bright side,” but the outlook does not seem to be terribly bright.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2025-26 (United Kingdom Context)

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Michelle Thomson

I thank the witnesses for joining us—it has been a very worthwhile session. I want to finish off by getting your reflection on Brexit, which, incredibly, we have barely discussed. You comment that

“Weak growth in imports and exports over the medium term partly reflect the continuing impact of Brexit”.

You then refer to a decrease in trade intensity, which I think that I asked about this time last year.

My question is about the impact on potential productivity in the light of the budget being projected as a growth budget. I know that you commented on that in March earlier this year, but it would be useful to get your latest reflections on the specific impact of Brexit on productivity. Obviously, we have the nearside issues, but I am asking about the longer term—I think that you used a 15-year projection.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2025-26 (United Kingdom Context)

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Michelle Thomson

You have just made the point that I was going to come on to. We face the geopolitics: we are out of the EU, we have the diminishing trade intensity and we have activity in the rest of the world. We have President Trump and there are geopolitics going on, so we could end up being in a very isolated place when it comes to replacing some of that trade, notwithstanding the point that you make about services.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

First Minister’s Question Time

Meeting date: 21 November 2024

Michelle Thomson

Yesterday, Unite the union gave evidence to the Economy and Fair Work Committee. In Unite’s view, Grangemouth is a “profitable” site, and “a distorted picture” has been given from the accounts available. It believes that there can be no justification for a closure now, and that money spent to support a bio-refinery will be wasted if the underlying skill base is lost.

The UK Government, with its inaction, has much to answer for, but will the First Minister commit to working on a pause in the closure, and not accept the loss of that national strategic asset without a clearer path to a just transition?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

First Minister’s Question Time

Meeting date: 21 November 2024

Michelle Thomson

To ask the First Minister when the Scottish Government last met with Ineos or Petroineos to discuss the refinery at Grangemouth. (S6F-03558)

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Petroineos Grangemouth

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Michelle Thomson

You have turned down the volume with your latter comments. However, I want to be absolutely clear: is it your contention that the information that the committee has been given by Petroineos regarding the hydrocracker and its operational safety is inaccurate, or do you not have sufficient information to be able to make that assertion? If it is the latter, are you able to provide the committee with all the pieces of evidence that you believe support your view? Can you clarify that point for the public record?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Petroineos Grangemouth

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Michelle Thomson

Okay, thank you.

I want to look at the bigger picture. I have often heard people commenting about energy security, and Unite has also made a comment about it. In the light of changed geopolitics—an issue that I brought up in committee last week—to what extent do you think that issues around energy security have been fully factored into the decisions regarding the refinery? On the back of that, what level of confidence do you have that the new geopolitical world, and energy security in particular, has been factored into the decision making of the UK Government and the Scottish Government?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Petroineos Grangemouth

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Michelle Thomson

I want to come on to that but I think that my colleague Kevin Stewart also wants to pick up on one of those points.