The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2032 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:You could also help me in what has ultimately been my failed mission to get the Scottish Government to routinely disaggregate and collect data by sex. It does so in many areas, but not in others.
That is me, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Good morning, and thank you for joining us. How many of the sectors referenced in the IDP, whether it be transport, economy, culture or any of the many others, do you think will have this plan on their noticeboards and will be referring to it frequently?
Ian, you looked at me, so you can answer the question. Peter was wise enough to look down.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Peter Reekie, since you looked down, we will play a wee game that I used to play with my kids. It is called the yes/no game. I anticipate that you will find it particularly difficult, but bear with me. My colleague John Mason picked up a question about sufficient detail. The point of this evidence session, as explained in the committee’s meeting papers, is that it
“is intended to provide a snapshot of how the IDP has been received amongst key sectors”.
I will ask about a few of the points mentioned in the paper. Just give me a yes or a no; I just want to get a flavour. The first bullet point is about whether
“the IDP provides certainty for project planning, private sector investment, innovation and skills development, to support economic growth”.
Does it do that—yes or no? The idea of certainty is a key point.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Yes. Were you surprised that, for example, the prioritisation is asserted rather than demonstrated—that there is no interdependency assessment and no look at integration, prioritisation, sequencing, capacity assessment, risk management, metrics, spatial strategies, supply chain considerations, governance and so on? Might you have expected to see any of that in the plan?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:You can have the final word, Ian.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Indeed. I could not agree more.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Either way, the effects will not be good and will add to an already constrained situation in a number of different areas.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:That leads me to my final question. You talked at the start about my pushing on diversity; I did a routine keyword search of your report and I noticed that the word “women” is mentioned once, “disability” is mentioned 28 times, and “child” is mentioned 40 times. It was a bit hard to search for “ageing”, because you use different terms.
Thinking about the challenges that we face—particularly with the cuts to health and social care, which we know will have a disproportionate impact on women, given their caring roles, how many are in those sorts of professions, the poverty effects and so on—I have to wonder why we are blind when it comes to any such data in your report. I have highlighted this issue before, but can you tell me what your rationale is in that respect? I would like to understand it. Moreover, might you consider doing something about that in future, given the disproportionate impact that we are seeing in certain emerging scenarios? I do not think that your report gives us that data or that insight, which I am sure that you have.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:I can—on balance and all things considered. Seriously, I am just trying to get a flavour.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:We have all done enough projects to know that a project plan is accurate only after the completion of the project. The spreadsheet that accompanies the IDP is pretty high level. The higher the level, the bigger the variance against any initial estimates will be.