The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1690 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
You are absolutely right: it comes down to risk. That will be as much a consideration for the Scottish Government and the UK Government because they cannot risk giving public funds that do not result in a sustainable business plan—we talked about demand earlier.
If things were to change, could chassis building be brought back to Falkirk? Is that an option that is being and should be considered?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay. That is good to hear.
How would you define the relationship between the unions and management? What, if any, changes would you want to put in place were a route forward for Falkirk to be found?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
I do not want to sound rude, but does it not tell you something if the unions came to us yesterday and used the term “frosty”? As a minimum, it suggests something about the manner of engagement, which goes beyond jobs and the functional stuff that they have to do with.
How would you classify your active engagement? The unions cited a specific example of their having written to you and not having gotten a response at all. There is clearly a perception that they are being talked at rather than engaged with.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning. Thank you for joining us. Obviously, the situation is a significant concern for me, because of the implications for the wider Falkirk district area. What other information or perception do you have about the impact on related jobs, and what are the implications of the loss of skills?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
From the Ernst & Young report, we know that the wider jobs impact in relation to the refinery was about 2,900 losses. Do you have a sense of the impact that would result from this closure?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
For the record, can you outline what the skills are?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
You alluded to the fact that you have had number of discussions with the Deputy First Minister. Throughout this evidence session, you have articulated well the big picture with regard to manufacturing, globalisation, supply chains and so on. Have you had any discussions with the UK Government specifically in relation to what you said about the light touch with regard to the industrial strategy, or have you had discussions only with the Scottish Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
You will be aware that that is an extraordinarily high figure when we look at industry standards. What plans do you have to change that and by when?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Despite the risk that that incurs. You will be aware that Sex Matters has already sent a letter before action, dated 18 June, giving 14 days’ notice of legal action. I understand that it is in the public domain today that there is a further email to you from For Women Scotland in which it notes that, if you do not take action, it reserves the right to take further action. Therefore, that is two potential further legal cases, and, given the strength of the Supreme Court judgment, we can anticipate the way in which those would go, potentially with a significant loss of public money. I am staggered that you are not acting now and that you are saying that we need to wait, when Baroness Falkner has said so clearly that you should not wait for her guidance.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
But you are accountable—you are the accountable officer—