The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1482 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Karen Adam
Good morning, and welcome to the third meeting in 2026 of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have no apologies this morning, but Rhoda Grant and Marie McNair are joining us remotely. This is Rhoda’s first meeting back with the committee; we are very pleased to welcome you back, Rhoda.
Our first agenda item is the continuation of our scrutiny of the budget for 2026-27. I refer members to papers 1 and 2. I welcome to the meeting Shona Robison, Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government, and Kaukab Stewart, Minister for Equalities. The cabinet secretary and minister are accompanied by Simon Fuller, deputy director for fiscal strategy and analysis, and Rob Priestley, head of the Scottish Government’s mainstreaming unit. You are all very welcome. Thank you for attending.
I invite the cabinet secretary and the minister to give short opening statements before we move on to questions.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Karen Adam
Thank you. I call Paul McLennan.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Karen Adam
Oh, Rhoda—we have you now.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Karen Adam
We now move on to questions from Marie McNair.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Karen Adam
Welcome back. Our next item of business is consideration of two draft affirmative instruments.
I welcome to the meeting Siobhian Brown, Minister for Victims and Community Safety, who is accompanied by the following Scottish Government officials: Ciaran McDonald, legal aid reform team leader; Connor Duffy, legal aid reform manager; and Martin Brown, lawyer, legal directorate. I thank them for attending this morning.
I refer members to papers 3 and 4 and invite the minister to speak to the two draft instruments.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Karen Adam
Thank you, minister. We have some questions from members.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Karen Adam
Yes. We will then go to Paul McLennan and Rhoda Grant.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Karen Adam
I am cognisant of the time, and I did say that we have to be mindful of other members—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Karen Adam
That brings our budget evidence session to a close. I thank everyone for their attendance. There will be a brief suspension to allow for a change of witnesses.
11:24
Meeting suspended.
11:34
On resuming—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Karen Adam
Do members agree to delegate to me responsibility for approving the publication of a short factual report on our deliberations on the affirmative instruments that we have considered today?
Members indicated agreement.