The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1444 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Karen Adam
I invite the member to bring that up with the rest of the committee. We will have those discussions.
I thank the minister and her officials for joining us today.
That brings us to the conclusion of our session in public. We will now go into private to discuss the remaining items on our agenda.
12:38
Meeting continued in private until 12:45.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Karen Adam
Tess White will ask the next questions.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Karen Adam
We move on to questions from Maggie Chapman.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Karen Adam
Good morning, and welcome to the first meeting in 2026, in session 6, of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have received apologies from Paul O’Kane, and Marie McNair will be joining us remotely.
Our only public agenda item is an evidence session following the committee’s report on the operation of the public sector equality duty in Scotland, which was published last year. Under the duty, public authorities in Scotland are legally required to consider equality when carrying out their functions. This morning, we will hear from the Equality and Human Rights Commission and the Minister for Equalities.
The witnesses on our first panel are representing the Equality and Human Rights Commission. I welcome John Wilkes, its head of Scotland, and Jennifer Laughland, its head of Scotland legal. Thank you for joining us.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2. Before we move to questions, I ask John Wilkes to make a brief opening statement, please.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Karen Adam
I will bring in Tess White.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Karen Adam
Pam Gosal has a question.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Karen Adam
Could I just come in? We have gone five minutes over the minister’s time. Minister, are you comfortable if Tess White wants to follow that up?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Karen Adam
Thank you very much.
We will move to questions. The committee found that the PSED is not delivering its aim to improve outcomes for people with protected characteristics. Why do you think that it has failed to achieve that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Karen Adam
That brings this session to a close. I thank the witnesses once again for their evidence today. We will suspend briefly while we have a changeover of witnesses.
11:22
Meeting suspended.
11:24
On resuming—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Karen Adam
Just to note that we are running out of time and Tess White still has her question to ask. We have to be quite sharp.