The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1017 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Karen Adam
I call Tess White to speak to amendment 638 and other amendments in the group.
12:00Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Karen Adam
Welcome back. Amendment 179, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 180 to 188, 543, 189, 190, 544, 191 to 199 and 545.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Karen Adam
Amendment 548, in the name of Tess White, has already been debated with amendment 541. If amendment 548 is agreed to, I cannot call amendments 206 to 208 because of pre-emption.
Amendment 548 not moved.
Amendment 206 to 208 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Section 26, as amended, agreed to.
After section 26
Amendment 209 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Section 27—Publication of draft regulatory scheme and representations
Amendments 210 to 213 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Section 27, as amended, agreed to.
Section 28—Consideration of applications
Amendments 214 to 216, 218, 217 and 219 to 227 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Section 28, as amended, agreed to.
11:15Section 29—Approval of application and giving effect to the regulatory scheme
Amendments 228 to 234 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Section 29, as amended, agreed to.
Section 30—Exercise of rights to provide legal services
Amendment 235 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Section 30, as amended, agreed to.
Section 31—Surrender of rights
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Karen Adam
Amendment 236, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 237 to 249, 264, 266, 265 and 267 to 270.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Karen Adam
Amendment 250, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 455 to 458.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Karen Adam
Amendment 68, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 93 to 101, 105, 104, 102, 103, 106 to 121, 310, 311, 122 to 178 and 459.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Karen Adam
Amendment 200, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 201 to 235. I point out that amendments 206, 207 and 208 are pre-empted by amendment 548, previously debated in the group entitled “Complaints: Commission to investigate and determine all complaints (services, conduct and regulatory).”
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Karen Adam
Would the minister like to wind up?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Karen Adam
As no other member wishes to come in, I call the minister to wind up.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Karen Adam
Amendment 549, in the name of Pam Gosal, has already been debated with amendment 271. I call Pam Gosal to move or not move amendment 549.