Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 14 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1176 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 May 2022

Karen Adam

I have a question, if that is all right. It is fine if we have run out of time.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 May 2022

Karen Adam

What are your views on that being a safeguarding measure? We have had discussions about three-month reflection periods and three-month application process periods. Is the potential for prosecution a good safeguarding measure?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 May 2022

Karen Adam

What type of people make up the panel?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 May 2022

Karen Adam

You touched on the number of people on the waiting list. A question that has come up is that, with making it easier for people to apply for a GRC, there will be an increase in the number of people coming forward. Will you explain why that would be?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 May 2022

Karen Adam

I ask Mhairi Crawford to come in on my initial question.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 May 2022

Karen Adam

So they are not necessarily experts with regards to gender.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 May 2022

Karen Adam

Good morning and welcome to the committee. In your written submissions, you have shown support for the removal of the requirement for the applicant to have medical evidence of gender dysphoria. You have also shown support for the replacement of the GRP with the registrar general. Can you explain your reasons and include any issues that you can see with providing medical evidence?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 May 2022

Karen Adam

I have a supplementary question. You mentioned the GRP. Are you saying that the panel would not necessarily meet the person who is applying at all?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 May 2022

Karen Adam

Under the bill, making a false statutory declaration or false application would be a criminal offence, punishable by up to two years in prison and/or a fine. What are your thoughts on that?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Good Food Nation (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 May 2022

Karen Adam

Amendment 59 proposes that Scottish ministers should be required to consult

“Before making regulations under section 4, 7(2)(c) or 10”.

That means that ministers would need to consult before making regulations to specify functions in the exercise of which they are to have regard to the national good food nation plan, before making regulations to specify a public authority as a relevant authority and before making regulations to specify functions in the exercise of which the relevant authorities are to have regard to their good food nation plan. As is the case with amendments 60 and 68, in the name of Alasdair Allan, that would require the use of the affirmative procedure for several regulation-making powers that are currently subject to the negative procedure.

The amendments seek to address the recommendation in the committee’s stage 1 report that there should be greater levels of scrutiny of and consultation on the secondary legislation that will result from the bill.

Amendments 61 to 63 and 65 to 67, in the name of Beatrice Wishart, present alternative routes to achieving that extra level of scrutiny. However, my view is that those go beyond what the committee suggests in its report would be proportionate or necessary.

I move amendment 59.