The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1085 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft] Business until 12:46
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Marie McNair
I appreciate getting the opportunity to speak early on in the group, convener, which will enable me to get back to the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee.
My amendment 244 goes to the heart of the wider debate about assisted dying. Those who are in favour of the bill have consistently said that it is about allowing someone to end their own life and not about another person ending it for them. However, the bill as drafted does not clearly rule out that possibility. There is no clear prohibition on another person administering the life-ending substance on behalf of the patient, and that omission matters. If another person can administer the substance, we are not talking about assisted dying but about euthanasia. That is a very different act in moral and legal terms. If the Parliament allows that ambiguity to remain, we risk crossing a boundary that even many supporters of assisted dying do not wish to cross.
My amendment would bring clarity. It would strengthen section 15 to make it explicit that the substance must be self-administered by the terminally ill adult, and that no one else may do so on their behalf. It would preserve the distinction between assisted dying and euthanasia—a distinction that supporters of the bill believe is fundamental. It would ensure that assisted dying remains in law and in practice an act of personal agency, rather than the taking of life by another. Proponents of assisted dying say that they oppose euthanasia. If that is truly the case, they should have no hesitation in supporting the amendment.
11:00Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Marie McNair
Good morning. I want to cover the bill’s definition of “sustainable development”, which seems to align very closely with the Scottish Government’s suggestion in its own consultation. However, in our evidence sessions we have heard that the bill’s proposed definition could be strengthened. What is the Scottish Government's view on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you. I was going to ask a follow-up question, but it has been covered.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Marie McNair
That was really helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Marie McNair
I am sorry to put you on the spot, Jenny, but your written evidence stated that the bill
“should support planners in their continued delivery of sustainable development and wellbeing”
but that there is a need to be mindful of existing definitions and obligations. How might planning authorities balance those requirements if the bill is passed?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Marie McNair
In the interests of time, I will be brief as well. If you do not really want to answer a question—if it is not relevant to you—please do not do so.
I will start with Jenny Munro. I want to ask about the definition of public bodies and the duty on public bodies. In section 1, is the definition of public bodies appropriate? Should it include all those who contract with public bodies?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Marie McNair
That was helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you.
The witnesses’ written evidence suggests that the duty
“to have due regard for the need to promote wellbeing and sustainable development”
could allow adherence to be something of a tick-box exercise. Do you want to take this opportunity to set out concerns and how they could be addressed in the bill?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Marie McNair
No.