The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1107 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Marie McNair
Good morning. Welcome back to the committee.
You mentioned in your opening contribution that next year the commission will focus on poverty and human rights. I am interested to hear a bit more detail about the proposed work on those important issues.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Marie McNair
Yes.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Marie McNair
Does the delay to the legislation have any impact on the Scottish human rights framework?
11:30Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you. That is helpful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you. I look forward to that. I will keep an eye on it.
Obviously, we are aware of the commission’s disappointment following the Scottish Government’s announcement that it is postponing the human rights bill until the next parliamentary session. You have already mentioned the framework, but what impact does that have on the framework and what engagement have you had with the Scottish Government on it?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Marie McNair
That is absolutely the most important thing.
With the value-for-money hat on, how can that be efficiently assessed? The witnesses we are going to hear from later will expect us to ask that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Marie McNair
I noticed that, in your report, you said that
“the Scottish Government does not have a clear strategy”
in relation to
“any UK decisions”.
It has been pretty hard recently. For example, initially, Labour MPs were not allowed to vote against the two-child cap policy—they got suspended if they did—but Labour is now scrapping it. It is hard for the Scottish Government to put a clear strategy in when things change so much, so can I push back on that point?
10:15Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Marie McNair
It is certainly a hard one, given that PIP is changing and is now under review. Does the £770 million forecast take into consideration that other funding, such as the industrial injuries disablement benefit and the changes to employment injury assistance, will come across? Are they considered as well?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Marie McNair
The report discussed the need to better understand the cost of how ADP differs from PIP, such as the different approach to reviews. During our pre-budget consideration, the Scottish Government told the committee that assigning costs to individual administrative processes, such as reviews, would, in essence, be arbitrary. Do you agree with that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Marie McNair
I could ask a lot more questions, but I think that the convener would be on my case.