The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1007 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Marie McNair
I am keen to continue with the line of questions that I asked of the previous panel. I would like to hear from Liz Hamilton first, then from anyone else who would like to come in.
Are you satisfied that terms such as “community wealth building” and “20-minute neighbourhoods” are sufficiently well defined and understood to provide a robust basis for planning decision making? You touched slightly on 20-minute neighbourhoods earlier, but you might want to expand.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Marie McNair
There are numerous references to the infrastructure-first approach in the revised NPF4. Can it be delivered in practice and, if not, what needs to change? I am keen to hear views on that. Previous witnesses have mentioned the resource implications.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Marie McNair
My questions follow the same line that I took with the previous two panels. Dr Brown, are you satisfied that terms such as “community wealth building” and “20-minute neighbourhoods” have been defined and are understood well enough to provide a robust basis for decision making on planning? I am keen to hear your views on that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Marie McNair
Thank you for those comments, which we take on board. Morag, do you want to come in on this?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Marie McNair
The revised draft NPF4 contains numerous references to the infrastructure-first approach. Is that being delivered in practice? If not, what needs to change?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Marie McNair
Good morning, panel. It is good to see you at the committee.
Are you satisfied that terms such as “community wealth building” and “20-minute neighbourhoods” are now sufficiently well defined and understood to provide a robust basis for planning decision making?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Marie McNair
I share that concern. Will Robbie Calvert share his thoughts on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Marie McNair
Good morning, minister. Audit Scotland and other organisations have asked in their submissions how the bill is consistent with other Scottish Government priorities, such as compliance with the European Charter of Local Self-Government, community empowerment and the local governance review. Would you like to comment on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Marie McNair
Thank you, minister. I appreciate your clarity.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Marie McNair
That is helpful. I had been going to ask you to clarify the issue of staff transfers, about which concerns have been raised, but you have clearly addressed that. I really appreciate your clarity on that, which I think gives reassurance to the 75,000 council staff members who have been mentioned.
The committee is committed to exploring the barriers to standing for local office. I think that it was Eddie Fraser from East Ayrshire Council who told the committee that the removal of social care from councils would influence whether people would be likely to stand in local elections. How do you feel about that? Can you expand on that?