Chamber and committees

I am grateful for the opportunity to speak in this important debate during the 16 days of action to end gender-based violence. It is up to us all to work together to prevent and end violence against women and girls and we must also address the underlying attitudes and systems that perpetuate it. To do that, we must unite our efforts across local, national and third sector plans to fully tackle violence against women and girls.

West Dunbartonshire, which is part of my constituency, continues to have the second highest rate of domestic abuse in Scotland. For many decades, a key source of support throughout my constituency was Clydebank Women’s Aid. I have mentioned its superb work in previous speeches but, unfortunately, it announced its closure earlier this year. I worked closely with that organisation for more than 20 years, so I know how tirelessly it has worked and how much of an impact it had on the lives of those most in need. Women, children and young people deserve to live a life free of fear and violence, and Clydebank Women’s Aid has been a crucial source of support for those who have experienced domestic abuse.

The closure was a real blow to our town, and I am extremely disappointed that that decision was made and that the organisation was not better supported with secure funding from the Labour-run West Dunbartonshire Council. It has left Clydebank vulnerable without a vital service, which is why I am speaking today to push for more for my town to ensure that it is not left behind in cross-party and cross-Government efforts to end violence against women and girls.

Clydebank is a clear example of why it is vital that we unite local and national efforts in tackling this issue, and that is why I am glad this year to support the reclaim the night march in Clydebank, which is organised by Clydebank Women Supporting Women and the youth charity Y Sort-It. The march will allow us to stand together in solidarity, raise awareness and challenge violence against women and girls in Clydebank and beyond. My sincere thanks go to Clydebank Women Supporting Women and Y Sort-It for organising that important event.

I welcome the fact that the Scottish Government has taken a number of steps to legislate for action on domestic abuse, including the Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 2018, which created a specific offence of domestic abuse that incorporates coercive and controlling behaviour. Through the equally safe fund, the Government will provide £21.6 million to 115 projects that focus on preventing and eradicating violence against women and girls.

Gender-based violence is a harsh reality that is experienced by our mothers, sisters, daughters and friends. It knows no bounds and it significantly impacts the individual and even wider society.

The theme of the 16 days this year, led by UN Women, is “UNiTE to end digital violence against all women and girls”. It reminds us that violence is not just physical; it follows survivors into digital spaces. It highlights the growing threat of online harassment, image-based abuse and digital coercive control. Digital spaces should be safe for everyone but, unfortunately, they are not. I know that many of my female colleagues have faced online abuse in their role as MSPs. That is simply not acceptable.

Digital violence is the fastest-growing form of abuse against women and children worldwide. The development of digital technologies such as artificial intelligence poses new risks for women and girls, such as the development of deepfakes. Action is required across all policy areas, with Government and tech companies all working together to respond to the added risks that that may pose to women.

I therefore welcome the fact that the Scottish Government is giving the issue absolute priority and is working to deliver the equally safe strategy for preventing and eradicating violence against women and girls. I am pleased that it has established an internal policy group on technology-facilitated violence against women and girls, in recognition of the cross-cutting nature of the issue. That work seeks to accelerate the Scottish Government’s strategic approach to tackling the issue, including how it further strengthens its approach to addressing online misogyny. We know that we will see real change only when those who perpetrate domestic abuse, the majority of whom are men, change their behaviours and actions. We need to educate boys from an early age about respect for women, consent and empathy for others. That is an invaluable tool to tackling this abhorrent issue and changing societal behaviour.

Imagining a Scotland without gender-based violence should not be difficult. It is achievable, and I am pleased to see the work that is being done on it by the Scottish Government. It is vital that we continue the momentum and unite to ensure that women and girls can live a life free from fear and violence.

Glasgow has built a track record of hosting successful events and has become a world-class hosting destination with the necessary facilities and expertise for delivery, and we must celebrate this opportunity to host the games. The cabinet secretary touched on that in his statement, but will he expand on the importance to Scotland’s international reputation of Glasgow’s developing position as a global sports hub?

That is absolutely the most important thing.

With the value-for-money hat on, how can that be efficiently assessed? The witnesses we are going to hear from later will expect us to ask that.

I noticed that, in your report, you said that

“the Scottish Government does not have a clear strategy”

in relation to

“any UK decisions”.

It has been pretty hard recently. For example, initially, Labour MPs were not allowed to vote against the two-child cap policy—they got suspended if they did—but Labour is now scrapping it. It is hard for the Scottish Government to put a clear strategy in when things change so much, so can I push back on that point?

It is certainly a hard one, given that PIP is changing and is now under review. Does the £770 million forecast take into consideration that other funding, such as the industrial injuries disablement benefit and the changes to employment injury assistance, will come across? Are they considered as well?

The report discussed the need to better understand the cost of how ADP differs from PIP, such as the different approach to reviews. During our pre-budget consideration, the Scottish Government told the committee that assigning costs to individual administrative processes, such as reviews, would, in essence, be arbitrary. Do you agree with that?

I could ask a lot more questions, but I think that the convener would be on my case.

We have touched on this a wee bit. The report recommends replacing the 20m rule with criteria relating to real-life experience. You have spoken about the living environment, the availability of public transport, the impact of exertion and whether aids are used. Can you expand a little on how you envisage that far more holistic approach working in practice?

Thank you. You were talking about additional costs;. We hear that quite a lot—it is thrown in our face—about the introduction of short-term assistance payments. However, I see those as a welcome barrier to the cliff edge of poverty when a negative decision is challenged. What did your review find, and has it been seen as welcome and as a support of change?

Thank you. I am glad that it is making a difference.

Can I have one final question, which is about the Timms review?