The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1746 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
So, that is a cautious yes—as long as more detail is provided.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
It sounds as though teachers are saying what they said to us during stage 1, which is that things are voluntary but not voluntary. I do not think that matters, including whether teachers have caring responsibilities, were addressed then. How would such issues be addressed? I am going off topic a little bit.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
I am sorry, but I did not quite catch what the process would be. Could you say that again?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Well, you just never know, and I just do not want that to be—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Good morning and thank you for coming along.
I will ask about the proposed changes to children’s hearings. Responses to the suggestion that single-member panels be introduced have been split. Some people are for them and some are against. What are your views on the proposal and on what level of decision a single-person panel should take?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
You touched briefly on this, but what are your views on whether remuneration or paid allowances should be introduced?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Fiona Duncan or Fraser McKinlay, do you have different opinions, or would you like to offer up anything else? If not, I will pass back to the convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
See, convener—I am quick.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
The importance of the contribution of pupils feeling supported towards improving their behaviour in schools cannot be overestimated. Will the minister speak further on how the Scottish Government’s 2025-26 budget is delivering measures to assist young folk throughout every stage of their school experience?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Jackie Dunbar
I, too, thank the committee for the hard work that was put into the report.
We are here to discuss audits of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland, but it would be remiss of me not to reflect on some other aspects of water in Scotland, given the public coverage that there was over the recess. In case colleagues do not recall it, I remind them that the UK environment secretary, Steve Reed, made some very daft comments—in my opinion—about Scottish water. He claimed wrongly that pollution levels are worse in Scotland than in England. I would expect better from a UK minister than to share such misleading claims, to talk down Scotland and to talk down the value of Scottish Water being in public hands in the process.
I am not going to suggest that everything to do with water in Scotland is perfect. Clearly, we have a report in front of us that recognises what has not gone right—in this case, in the Water Industry Commission for Scotland. However, I want to make clear a few things that are undeniable. In Scotland, we have less pollution in our waterways than England has. A recent report found that 66 per cent—two thirds—of Scotland’s water bodies are of good ecological status, compared with just 16.1 per cent in England and 29.9 per cent in Wales.
Moreover, water bills are lower. Water bills in Scotland average just £490 compared with £603 across England. In addition, Scottish Water being in Scotland’s hands is working because public ownership means not having to pay out millions in dividends. As a result, it costs folk less to have the cleaner water that we have in Scotland.
My final point is that tap water in Scotland is tastier. I have tried tap water in other places and it has not been that great. When we get to a tap in Scotland, especially in the north-east and the Highlands, and pour ourselves a glass of cold, crisp Scottish water, we soon find out that it is delicious.
Having covered that off and said my piece about Scottish Water, I want to go on to the substance of the report. It highlights a number of failures at the Water Industry Commission for Scotland—which I am going to call WICS from now on, as I just stumbled over saying it. There were a number of financial management and governance failures at the commission; there was retrospective authorisation of high-cost training; there were improper staff gifts; there were weak financial controls; there were cultural issues with bullying; and there was a lack of challenge to leadership. All of those things were unacceptable. We expect our public bodies to have the highest standards, and that was not the case here.
I am pleased that the Scottish Government has acted decisively by strengthening the WICS board, resetting the organisation from the top down and appointing interim members to get the organisation on a path to rebuilding public trust. The report is part of that process, too.