The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1623 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackie Dunbar
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on its latest engagement with STV regarding the broadcaster’s plans to cut jobs and regional news programming. (S6O-05125)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackie Dunbar
STV claimed that falling viewer figures and advertising revenue were to blame for it slashing 60 jobs and axing north of Scotland news. However, we have now learned from STV North’s own accounts that profits rose by almost 24 per cent last year on the back of increased income from advertising. The cuts simply do not make sense and they fail communities and viewers in Aberdeen and the north-east. Does the cabinet secretary agree that local journalism is a vital part of a democratic society? Can he provide an update on the latest engagement with STV in the light of that news?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Jackie Dunbar
I thank the member for taking my intervention.
I am following this part of the discussion very closely. You said that, if care homes and hospices were not allowed to opt out, that would prevent them from taking people in. Would this not also apply to people that they want to employ as members of their team? It would have the opposite effect. If a care home opted out and said that it was not willing to participate, that could mean that anybody it wanted to employ would have to have the same opinion. My father was in a care home, and it would have caused me great concern that his care home would not be fully staffed in the future. Are you saying that if there was no opt-in or opt-out, that would not be the case? I feel a bit conflicted.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Yes. I never got an answer to my question, but it does not matter.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Thank you for letting me say a few words, convener. I would just like to tell the committee that, although I was not at last week’s meeting, I have listened to the whole proceedings. I am therefore not coming in cold, so to speak, and I feel able to take part in today’s session.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Will the member take an intervention?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Jackie Dunbar
It was whether what you were looking to put in place would be in line with what is currently in place with regard to decisions that are made at present. Someone might want to put a DNR notice on their record, which they are quite entitled to do, but would what is in your amendments be in line with the procedures that they would have to go through?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Jackie Dunbar
For clarity, you said that the option to opt in would be offered at the beginning of someone’s medical training. Do you foresee having an opt-out option, if someone changed their mind as their training went on and they had experience of dealing with day-to-day situations? Whether someone has opted out or opted in, could they change that later?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Fulton MacGregor talked about the vulnerability assessment. Can you explain what would happen if the person were not known to social services? How would they be protected? To me, it sounds as if there might be a two-tier assessment process.
Moreover, if what you propose were to be put in place, would it be in line with what is currently in place for other end-of-life decisions? Do people who want to put a “Do not resuscitate” notice on their records, or who decide that they do not want to go forward with other treatments, have to go through such a process just now?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Jackie Dunbar
Will Stephen Kerr give way?