The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 592 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
The key area of disagreement between animal welfare groups in our targeted call for views was on restricting the ban to oval racetracks. Dogs Trust, for example, said that that might be a loophole. What is your response to that concern, and are you still confident that that is the correct approach?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
We know that the Thornton track is not operating at the moment, and we have heard from the Scottish Greyhound Sanctuary that there is a rehoming crisis. The lack of racing in Scotland has not reduced the number of greyhounds; the crisis relates to the churn of dogs that are still coming in from Ireland. Is there a need for more support in the rehoming sector in Scotland in general? Could your bill do anything to support the rehoming sector?
12:00Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
I have a question about section 14, which concerns the commission’s powers to adjust boundaries. We have heard in evidence from legal stakeholders concerns about the possible conflict with title boundaries, which could create disputes. How will the bill ensure alignment between the crofting register and the land register while allowing practical boundary corrections?
09:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
We heard in evidence from Brian Inkster that he thinks that the proposed provisions are “a recipe for disaster”.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
In relation to having three crofts within a family.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Good morning. Some concerns were raised in evidence that the merger is a cost-cutting exercise. You have indicated that the two courts have gradually merged over the past four years. Are you able to provide any reassurance that the efficiency of the expanded court will not be compromised by the merger?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Good morning. I guess that this question could come under the unintended consequences heading. In its written evidence, GBGB stated that,
“were a ban on greyhound racing to be introduced, there is a very real risk that the activity would be driven underground.”
It then stated that that would pose a greater risk to welfare. Has the Scottish Government considered that risk and whether any underground activity would be a likely or realistic consequence of the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
So, you do not see it as being a possibility.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Thanks, convener. It is good to be back in person.
The next theme is the Crofting Commission’s powers in sections 8 to 14. I know that my colleague Emma Harper has a question on section 10. I would be interested to start the conversation on the three-croft limit in section 8 and the view that it is a somewhat arbitrary figure. Could we open up a conversation around that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Good morning, panel. My question is about the governance and use of common grazings and whether the changes will provide sufficient clarity, accountability and legal certainty. Brian Inkster made reference to a “can of worms”, and, from what we have heard, I think that we are looking at more than one. If anybody wants to add anything to what has been said, I am happy to hear it.
I want to ask a question about Shetland. A few years back, there was an application to establish a community woodland on common grazings, which involved contact with the Crofting Commission and the Scottish Land Court. I am told that it cost £500 and took eight months to conclude. A constituent involved in the process suggested that decision making on that type of land use change should be devolved to relevant grazings committees. I am interested to hear the panel’s views on that suggestion.