Item 5 is consideration of the procedure for introducing a committee bill. Members will recall that the issue arose during last week’s consideration of petition PE1280, by Julia Love and Dr Kenneth Faulds, which calls for a fatal accident inquiry to be held when a person from Scotland dies abroad.
The point was a good one to raise at the time but, as the paper sets out, a committee bill probably should not be introduced if a minister has said in writing that they plan to introduce a bill on the same subject in this parliamentary session. This time round, the cabinet secretary’s commitment is firmer, so I am quite pleased with that.
The cabinet secretary’s letter certainly indicates a “firm intention” to introduce a bill. It gilds the lily somewhat in relation to his previous letter, which did not give the same firm commitment. Others on the committee will know from experience whether such firm commitments are always delivered on.
I am sure that members will assure us that such commitments are delivered on. Some committee members will now have salt on the cabinet secretary’s tail.
That takes us back to the question last week about what we do with the petition. I remember that there were some options, one of which was to keep the petition open. Will we still keep the petition open until firm legislation comes forward?
I think so.
I think so. The petition is important so, in fairness to the petitioners, we will keep it open.
We will add some pepper to the salt.
Adding pepper to salt—my goodness.
As agreed earlier, we will move into private session.
Previous
Subordinate Legislation