Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Bruce Hobbs submission of 17 June 2021
PE1864/ZZZ - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Environmental Statements (ES) accompanying windfarm applications are enormous documents purportedly written by experts giving an independent view into the merits of the application. I believe that as they are financed by the applicants they cannot be independent and thus need to be scrutinised by Councils and by any objectors. This is a daunting task.
The Statements usually involve large and complex chapters with headings such as The Proposal, Landscape and Visual Assessment, Ecology, Ornithology, Cultural Heritage, Water and Soils, Noise, Traffic and Transport, Socio-Economics, Telecommunications and Planning Policy and one in which I was involved ran to 465 pages. This was accompanied by 15 Technical Appendices (1,275 pages) and two volumes of photographs, wirelines and photomontages.
Councils and most local communities simply do not have the skills and range of expertise themselves, or the finance to commission such skills, that are required to investigate and challenge such Environmental Statements.
In one application I dealt with I demonstrated the bias and lack of rigour in the ES, through a Precognition on Bias.
I showed that all likely impacts were downplayed, rather than having the precautionary principle applied, and that many of the appellants statements and conclusions were subjective opinions rather than assessments based on scientific evidence or common sense.
I also demonstrated that that there was generally a lack of rigour throughout the ES presented.
Subjective opinions
The appellants used expressions seeking to assure the reader there would be minimum effects arising from the siting of this industrial power station.
In one example, they said that there will only be a “medium change” and a “moderate visual effect”, however the turbines in question would tower some 330ft above motorists, cyclists and walkers. This is more than one and a half times the height of the Scott Monument on Princes Street. Common sense would suggest that these words are too conservative.
The ES even stated the turbines would “provide a new animated feature to the landscape providing a focus to the view”. Hardly required as this area subsequently became a Special Landscape Area.
At a Public Inquiry, residents of a property with a direct view to turbines 1km distant were told they could “look to the left and right and not see turbines and as they drove away they would not see them”.
In another example, the ES stated that the application site “is considered to be of negligible importance for pink-footed geese and greylag geese”. However, the application is for an area close to Aberlady Bay, which is designated as an internationally important wetland, home to 12% of the world’s population of pink-footed geese. There are substantial flightpaths across the proposed site.
Lack of rigour
There was also a lack of rigour in the data that was presented. For example—
- Traffic count data left more than 2000 vehicles unaccounted for;
- The noise and wind data presented in the ES was measured at two different timescales;
- Despite paying “particular attention” to whether Large Heath butterflies were on the site, none were found. This was not actually surprising as investigations were conducted in May and June when the butterfly is known not to hatch until July;
- A 24-inch gas pipeline traverses the site and the proposal has a turbine only 50m away. Regulations state the buffer zone should be 90m;
- Three turbines were located too close to a road (60m). The regulation minimum distance is topple height plus 10% (so in this case should have been 110m); and
- A National Vegetation Classification & Bryophyte Survey, two Peat Assessment Annexes and information forwarded to the Ministry of Defence all gave different locations for the proposed turbines thus the surveys were not undertaken in the correct locations.
We alerted the Appellants to turbine location mismatches and sought a definitive turbine location list (from which our consultants could work). Two turbines given occupied the same spot and a third had no coordinates.
The Appellants insisted that the information they had given was correct and suggested we read documents more carefully!
We were proved correct and were subsequently awarded £16,000 expenses for the consequences of their errors.
Conclusions
I have noted just a few of the subjective, minimalising statements that appeared throughout the ES which, I believe, were trying to downplay the real effects of siting 100m high whirling turbines in open countryside.
I have cited numerous instances of lack of rigour that demonstrate a substandard approach to assembling supporting material.
I believe that in such cases there can be little confidence as to the accuracy of supporting material, and thereby of the real effects of the proposed development.
It is for this reason that I believe Environmental Statements should be independent and why I support the action called for in the petition.
Related correspondences
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Scottish Government submission of 1 June 2021
PE1864/A - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Alec Kidd submission of 2 June 2021
PE1864/B - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Christopher Shaw submission of 3 June 2021
PE1864/C - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Helen Braynis submission of 3 June 2021
PE1864/D - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Elaine Nisbet submission of 5 June 2021
PE1864/E - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Victoria Boyle submission of 3 June 2021
PE1864/F - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Iain Milligan submission of 4 June 2021
PE1864/G - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
John Logan submission of 4 June 2021
PE1864/H - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Janet and Michael Holley submission of 4 June 2021
PE1864/I - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Tracey Smith submission of 4 June 2021
PE1864/J - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Matthew Reiss submission of 4 June 2021
PE1864/K - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Jerry Mulders submission of 4 June 2021
PE1864/L - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
William Jackson submission of 5 June 2021
PE1864/M - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Caithness West Community Council submission of 7 June 2021
PE1864/N - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
J W Ponton submission of 7 June 2021
PE1864/O - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
George Herraghty submission of 7 June 2021
PE1864/P - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Ian Miller submission of 7 June 2021
PE1864/Q - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Greta Roberts submission of 7 June 2021
PE1864/R - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Sue Hall submission of 8 June 2021
PE1864/S - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
June and Ed Hall submission of 9 June 2021
PE1864/T - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Alison Johnston submission of 9 June 2021
PE1864/U - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Andrew Chadderton submission of 9 June 2021
PE1864/V - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
James Tanner submission of 9 June 2021
PE1864/W - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Amanda Rofe submission of 9 June 2021
PE1864/X - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Howard and Grace Goldstein submission of 9 June 2021
PE1864/Y - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Trevor Procter submission of 9 June 2021
PE1864/Z - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Petitioner submission of 9 June 2021
PE1864/AA - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Moraig Lyall submission of 9 June 2021
PE1864_BB - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Angus Farquhar submission of 10 June 2021
PE1864/CC - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Brian Johnstone submission of 10 June 2021
PE1864/DD - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Elaine Procter submission of 10 June 2021
PE1864/EE - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Hazel Appleton submission of 10 June 2021
PE1864_FF - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Peter Dunn submission of 10 June 2021
PE1864_GG - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
John Edmondson submission of 10 June 2021
PE1864/HH - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Petitioner submission of 11 June 2021
PE1864/II - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Rosemary Milne submission of 11 June 2021
PE1864/JJ - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Elinor Ross submission of 11 June 2021
PE1864/KK - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Alan Cairns submission of 11 June 2021
PE1864/LL - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Celia Hobbs submission of 11 June 2021
PE1864/MM - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Rachel Connor submission of 11 June 2021
PE1864/NN - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Brian Bell submission of 11 June 2021
PE1864/OO - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Ronald and Irene Bain submission of 11 June 2021
PE1864/PP - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Chris Fawcett submission of 11 June 2021
PE1864/QQ - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Jane Dickson submission of 12 June 2021
PE1864/RR - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
John Chapman submission of 12 June 2021
PE1864/SS - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Fiona Ainslie submission of 12 June 2021
PE1864/TT - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Alison Chapman submission of 12 June 2021
PE1864/UU - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Rowland Shallcross submission of 12 June 2021
PE1864/VV - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
David Scott submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/WW - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Patricia Brander submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/XX - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Alison and Paul Garrod submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/YY - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
James Taylor submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/ZZ - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Bob Chicken submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/AAA - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Simon Arnold submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/BBB - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Norrie McLeod submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/CCC - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Lorna McClean submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/DDD - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Lyndsey Ward submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/EEE - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Dr Guy Vernham submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/FFF - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Elizabeth and Ian Richardson submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/GGG - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Frank Hay submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/HHH - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Mary Young submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/III - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Chris Walsh submission of 13 June 2021
PE1864/JJJ - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Kathrin Haltiner submission of 14 June 2021
PE1864/KKK - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Stephen Mardon submission of 14 June 2021
PE1864/LLL - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Mrs S McKenzie submission of 14 June 2021
PE1864/MMM - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Moscow and Waterside Community Council submission of 14 June 2021
PE1864/NNN - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Margaret Addo submission of 14 June 2021
PE1864/OOO - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
John Scott submission of 14 June 2021
PE1864/PPP - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Jim Pratt submission of 14 June 2021
PE1864/QQQ - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
H Menhinick on behalf of Dailly Community Council submission of 14 June 2021
PE1864/RRR - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Gladys Speirs submission of 14 June 2021
PE1864/SSS - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Gilian Macpherson submission of 14 June 2021
PE1864/TTT - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Fiona Clubb submission of 14 June 2021
PE1864/UUU - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
David Slater submission of 15 June 2021
PE1864/VVV - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Geraldine Hamilton submission of 16 June 2021
PE1864/WWW - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Celia Strain submission of 16 June 2021
PE1864/XXX - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Alistair Buckoke submission of 17 June 2021
PE1864/YYY - Increase the ability of communities to influence planning decisions for onshore windfarms