The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1222 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
What was the position of practitioners in your consultation feedback? Is it your sense that they want a bit more flexibility rather than a rule that landlords have 30 days and then that is it?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Would you be happy with 28 days, Kieran?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Let us just say that we wanted to redraft section 5 of the bill and that we wanted to take out the term “reasonable period” and put in a period of time—a week, two days, 10 days, 30 days or whatever. Is there a period that you feel would define “reasonable”?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I will have one more bite of the cherry and push a wee bit further. Despite the issues that have been raised by different parties on the complexity of the new rules on giving notice, will the rules work quite well in practice, once they get going and everyone is used to them?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I will pick up on your final point. You said at the very start, and it is obvious, that the law is complex at the moment, and part of the aim of the bill is to try to simplify the law for practitioners and for tenants and small businesses, but I think that section 4 and section 5 leave some ambiguity. You just said that you do not think that those provisions could be drafted any more clearly. Will you explain why?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, and thank you for coming along. I want to move on to sections 2 to 7 of the bill, on the statutory code. How will it work in practice, day to day?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
My next question is for Steven Blane and Kieran Buxton. Is the day-to-day practice working? It may not be clear from an academic legal perspective, but are things working in practice? Are we in danger of making things more complicated in practice for both the landlord and the tenant?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I return to Carolyne Hair of the Law Society. We will get into the detail of the bill in a moment through our questions. First, considering the bill holistically and taking an overview, do you think that it goes too far and brings about too much change? I was not quite sure what your position was regarding the general principles of the bill. Is it too wide in its scope, and does it need to be pared back?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
We might seek to amend the bill; I am just trying to get some expertise from practitioners. If I were to lodge a stage 2 amendment to stipulate “28 days”, “30 days” or “50 days”, what would be reasonable, from a practitioner’s perspective?
11:15Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
On that issue—others can pick this up—we heard that, in other jurisdictions, there is a much more fixed way of doing it. For example, there can be a 30-day period. Not necessarily from a practitioner’s point of view, but from the perspective of your clients, would that be too much of a change to the law?