The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1011 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Brian Whittle
Good morning. This is my pet topic as well. I want to talk about the food system and population health priorities, which should drive everything that we do in this area. I completely agree with Geoff Ogle about measuring childhood health.
I have a real concern about how the reduction in the consumption of red meat is being discussed and the potential impact on health. I am not even sure what the term “meat” means—you have referred to both “meat” and “processed meat”. Surely we should be reducing the consumption of processed meat rather than the consumption of meat in general. Two thirds of people do not have enough protein in their diet, and I am particularly concerned about young girls, given their need for iron and iodine, which meat provides. Yes, too much red meat is bad for you, but too little is really bad for you as well.
How we discuss the issue concerns me, because we seem to be focused on, as one of my colleagues mentioned, the climate impact, which I also challenge. My fear is that our approach is driving poor diets to become even worse. There must be a better way of discussing the issue.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Brian Whittle
Correct.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Brian Whittle
There have been significant increases in the cost of delivering personal and nursing care, so any increase in funding is valuable and welcome. Minister, you indicated the potential financial constraints on delivering any more funding. My worry is that not delivering more funding is a false economy, because the costs will appear on another page of the ledger if we do not get this right. What work has been done, not just on this specific issue but across the wider portfolio, to assess the impact of not delivering what could be delivered?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Brian Whittle
We are kind of agreeing here, I think.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Brian Whittle
Do you agree that, by investing in social care, we could prevent much more costly interventions, including hospital interventions? There is an issue in how we balance funding and how we measure the outcomes from inputs.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Brian Whittle
My concerns are similar to those of my colleague Sandesh Gulhane. At the end of the day, I will vote in favour of approving the instrument because any uplift is crucial. However, what we are discussing is in no way reflective of what is required. As has been rehearsed by my colleague, huge amounts of money have been spent in other areas. If we are going to tackle the issues in social care and the connections with delayed discharge and prevent people from having to go into hospital care, we are going to have to think about it much more seriously than we currently are.
I will vote for the uplift, but I want to put those comments on record, because I do not think that the measures provide nearly what we need to do to tackle the issues that we have at the moment.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Brian Whittle
If the Care Inspectorate is inspecting against a code of practice that is not legally binding, what enforcement powers would it have?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Brian Whittle
I am, slightly.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Brian Whittle
It is not the 70g limit that worries me. I go back to Geoff Ogle’s point about those of us who have crept over 50—some of us have crept over 60. I suggest that the people in this room understand diet a lot better than the majority of the population.
I come from a time when, 50 years ago, the standard diet was meat, veg and potatoes, and there was a lot less obesity back then than there is now. I suggest that we are focusing on the wrong thing. We should be focusing on what has happened in the interim—fast food and the increase in salt, sugar and fat—rather than what we have just discussed.
We are going to have an argument about climate change soon, because I do not agree with that either. It is about getting back to the basics of eating what we grow and produce in our country.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Brian Whittle
We are very good at producing dairy, beef, root vegetables and fruit. If we can go back to a basic diet, it would solve a lot of the issues.