The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5488 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Finlay Carson
Is the minister content with the bill’s current wording in relation to relationship breakdown?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Finlay Carson
Specifically, though, given our understanding that the common-law offence of breach of the peace is being replaced by the use of the section 38 offence, do you think that there will be a similar trend in respect of dog theft? Will we see more people being prosecuted under the section 38 offence?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Finlay Carson
In his letter to the committee, Maurice Golden quotes evidence that shows that the common-law offence of breach of the peace has, increasingly, been replaced by an offence under section 38 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010. He then goes on to say that
“it is likely that there will be a similar trend in respect of the theft of a dog”.
Do you agree with that assumption?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. We will move on to our final questions, which are on the financial memorandum.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Finlay Carson
I have one final question on Police Scotland recording the data. Mr Wilson responded to an earlier question on that.
Would the Scottish Government consider amending the crime recording standard to require dog theft to be recorded as a specific stand-alone offence, rather than as an offence of robbery, theft or housebreaking?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Finlay Carson
Those are some fantastic reasons for the need for a consolidation bill to pull all of that together, Mr Wilson. You might consider that for the next parliamentary session. When that was suggested to our clerks at the beginning of the meeting, they almost had nervous breakdowns, but it is maybe something that the Government can take on board.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Finlay Carson
Minister, it would be helpful to the committee if you could provide a written update on the work of the advisory group and where we are with licensing.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Finlay Carson
I have a brief supplementary on that. Police Scotland suggested that
“The introduction of a standalone statutory offence of Dog Theft would not enhance accuracy of crime recording as the theft may be committed in commission of another crime”.
Could the bill be amended in some way to ensure that that data is collected? I suppose that that is a question for Jim Wilson.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Finlay Carson
What would need to be done to publicise the new law, if it were to come into force, to have that deterrent effect? Does there need to be something on that in the legislation? A huge part of Christine Grahame’s Welfare of Dogs (Scotland) Bill was about public awareness raising. Do we need to have that level of public awareness raising of this potential new law, to create the deterrent effect that Maurice Golden seeks?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Finlay Carson
Good morning, and welcome to the 13th meeting in 2025 of the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee. Please ensure that all electronic devices are switched to silent mode.
Our first item of business is to take evidence on the Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill from the Minister for Victims and Community Safety, Siobhian Brown, who is accompanied by a Scottish Government official. I also welcome Maurice Golden to the meeting for this item.
We have 90 minutes for this evidence session. Before we move to questions, I should make the witnesses aware—as they will already be—that they do not need to operate the microphones. That will be done for them.
I draw members’ attention to Maurice Golden’s response to a letter from the committee that asked specific questions on the bill. The Scottish Government highlighted similar points in its memorandum to the bill, so I hope that we can move the issue forward over the course of this morning’s evidence session.
Moving to our questions, I note that Maurice Golden believes that a stand-alone statutory offence would address what are, historically, low levels of cases of and prosecutions for dog theft. The committee has heard conflicting evidence on the ability of the common law offence to adequately take account of the harm caused to the owner—and, to some extent, the dog—following a dog theft. What are your views on the necessity of a specific stand-alone offence in that context?