The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1373 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Emma Harper
Will the member give way?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Emma Harper
On the back of the convener’s own declaration, I should declare that I am still a registered nurse.
My understanding is that nurses do go into a patient’s home on their own to refill or recharge a syringe driver containing, for instance, morphine, fentanyl and anti-emetic drugs. I am concerned about nurses going in on their own in this instance, although I do take on board what you have said about their being able to choose to have somebody with them at the beginning. I am just seeking clarity on the point that nurses are already able to act independently in a patient’s home and to manage such devices.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Emma Harper
Okay. One additional issue might be if land that was previously excluded were later added to a croft. Would it be part of the rectification process?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Emma Harper
As you were saying, this is about simplifying the process to make it easier for boundaries, fences or ditches that were previously excluded to be added to a croft.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Emma Harper
Okay. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning. My question is in a similar vein. It is about independent tracks. The Scottish Animal Welfare Commission’s report included a summary that said:
“Independent tracks, although they may provide some social benefit, do impose some specific risks on dog welfare through the lack of immediate veterinary care to injured dogs and general veterinary oversight of dog welfare.”
It also recommended that
“no further new greyhound tracks are permitted in Scotland”.
Mark Ruskell just mentioned Shawfield stadium. I think that it is proposed that that stadium be demolished for housing, so there will be no more racing in Rutherglen.
I am interested in how the data from independent tracks compares with that from the GBGB tracks. You have almost said it all already, based on the Shawfield evidence.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Emma Harper
Last week, you indicated to the committee that you were in discussions with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities about amending the bill to allocate enforcement powers or responsibilities to local authorities in addition to Police Scotland, which would currently have sole responsibility for enforcement under the bill. Can you provide an update on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Emma Harper
Last week, we heard that we are talking about speeds of almost 40mph—that is around 64kph—on the first bend. Those high speeds can lead to the greyhounds being injured.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning. No concerns have been raised about sections 21 or 25, which seek to simplify the governance of the crofting register and the register of crofts. That is good news.
Section 26 seeks to expand the powers on the correction of errors to allow the keeper to fix clerical mistakes at any time. Minister, you alluded to that when we talked about mapping and digitisation. Brian Inkster mentioned in his evidence that we might be opening “a can of worms” and raised concerns that allowing post-registration amendments to the crofting register could create legal uncertainty. Do you have any thoughts on the evidence that Mr Inkster submitted?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Emma Harper
I am looking at amendment 158 and listening carefully to what you are saying. I am not aware of the evidence that you are speaking about, and that evidence was not presented to the committee during stage 1. I am a health practitioner who has given patients strong medication such as fentanyl and morphine, among other things, and I am not clear on the side effects that you are talking about. I apologise for having a sidebar with my colleague, Joe FitzPatrick, but thank you for letting me in.