Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 25 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 811 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Ruth Maguire

Are electoral registration officers required to write to inform an elector about a mismatched record only once, or is there a requirement for a follow-up if no response is received?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Ruth Maguire

Good morning, minister. In your remarks about the preparation of the guidance and your request that it come back to the committee, you confirmed that that will happen following the Scottish election, so it should not confuse matters for that election. In addition to the targeted communication to those who have existing absent voter arrangements, will there be a wider awareness-raising campaign?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Ruth Maguire

Will the member take an intervention?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Ruth Maguire

I broadly agree that MSPs should be held to the highest standards; I do not think that there would be any argument with that. However, my sense is that the public expects a just justice system, and the principle of innocent until proven guilty is a cornerstone of that. I think that that is where the issue is. Do you recognise the unfairness of not following the principle of innocent until proven guilty?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Ruth Maguire

As am I.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Ruth Maguire

I do not disagree with the intention or what Alex Cole-Hamilton says. However, does he acknowledge that we will have to be careful because, if we have a PVG scheme or PVG-type scheme, safeguarding and appropriate ways of working will still be required? If someone has been checked and passes—if that is the correct word—those checks, all that that gives is a snapshot. It says that the person has not committed certain crimes up to that time. It does not mean that—sorry, I am finding this difficult to explain.

Alex Cole-Hamilton said that he has had a PVG check and that sometimes people ask to speak to him alone. He would still have to be conscious that doors should be open, for his protection and for the individual’s protection. We need to be clear that no one thing will fix any potential worries that anyone ever has. Do you understand what I mean?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

Why does there need to be a statutory obligation to formally consider proposals that are made by the Scottish Information Commissioner?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

You spoke a little about parliamentary committees potentially being able to designate bodies as public authorities. You have covered why you think that their being able to do so is appropriate, although you can add more to that if you wish.

The proposal would require there to be consultation before a resolution to designate bodies was passed. You will have heard the Scottish Government’s concerns about how proposals would be initiated and how the Parliament would assure itself that consultation was adequate. What process do you envisage for initiating resolutions and ensuring robust consultation?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

Yes.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

So, you envisage it being in standing orders rather than—