The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1455 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Maybe that co-operation could occur at the CPP level.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
I left Aberdeen today at 5.57 am on a high-speed train and got in almost on time at Waverley. I understand that HST procurement is under way, so I will not ask about that. All I will say is that there are reliability issues with HSTs, so the sooner that happens, the better.
However, with regard to other reliability issues, there are delays on the lines that I use because of specific infrastructure failures; indeed, some happen quite often as a result of the signalling around Montrose. Are those things monitored to the degree that they should be, and does Network Rail, in its improvement programmes, react by replacing what are often seen by commuters as consistent failures?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
On the issue of funding, local authorities always say that they are strapped for cash so is there an opportunity for them to use fines from low-emission zones or bus gates to fund some of those road safety schemes? Has that featured in the discussions that you have had with COSLA? Could that be opened up to debate, knowing of course that it is not directly under your control?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning, cabinet secretary. Having visited the Banffshire coast the other week, just a week after the 20mph areas came into play in Portsoy, Banff and Macduff, I could see a real difference in behaviours very quickly and the vast bulk of the folk I spoke to while I was there spoke very favourably about the introduction.
I recognise that those safety matters and local roads are a matter for local authorities. However, in terms of good practice, there are local authorities that continue, for example, to conduct regular area traffic management plans, which include safety features. Have you spoken to COSLA, the regional transport partnerships and others to see whether that best practice can be exported right across Scotland?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
The likes of that hub, led by North East Scotland College, is extremely important in ensuring that we have a workforce that is fit for the future. NESCol, of course, is one of the colleges that has adapted well over the years by providing the courses that are required to support an ever-changing workforce. How much work have you and other colleagues put into an audit of the kind of jobs that we will have in the future—I know that it is difficult—and the amount of people that we will need to staff up the sectors that we are talking about? Are colleges and other places doing enough to adapt and build the workforce for the future?
10:45Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
I am interested that you say that there is a parallel process with health. I recognise that the audit is a new thing, and that is all to the good. However, in some regards—you hit upon this yourself, Deputy First Minister—all that new investment and all those new skills that are required in the private sector, which are industry-led, will require a number of other things in a particular area, including an emphasis on the health workforce. We know that, in certain parts of the country, there are difficulties with the recruitment of certain health professionals. Rather than just having a parallel process, maybe you should refine the process and look at the entire thing in a holistic manner, including industry, private enterprise and the public sector.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Does that industry-led audit also include the staffing requirements for the future of the public sector?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning, Deputy First Minister. You talked earlier about your £1.3 billion budget, which is not insignificant, but growing the economy is vital. I want to get an idea of how there is co-operation across Government in recognition of the importance of growing the economy, with a pooling of budgets and resources to make things a reality. Do you think that we are doing our best in that regard?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Some folk are going to think that my next question is a bit of a patsy one—a plant—because of your last answer.
I will give the example of something that happened this week: the opening of the energy transition skills hub in Aberdeen. That involved an investment of £4.5 million from the Scottish Government and leveraged in private sector funding from the likes of Shell. The hub is being run by North East Scotland College. It is all very co-operative and vital for the future of the north-east economy and, I would argue, the whole of Scotland.
The money for that came from the just transition fund, which, I think, sits with the Cabinet Secretary for Climate Action and Energy. There is a huge input from the education portfolio on the skills aspect and there is the economic side. When decisions to invest in projects such as that energy transition skills hub are made, is there ministerial discussion about that and a strategic overview of how much bang we get for our buck?