The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1258 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 5, Against 5, Abstentions 0. As the outcome of the division on amendment 226 is tied, I will now use my casting vote as convener in order for the committee to reach a decision. I vote in favour of amendment 226. Amendment 226 is therefore agreed to on the casting vote of the convener.
Amendment 226 agreed to.
Amendment 227 not moved.
Amendment 50 moved—[Ross Greer].
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 50 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division.
For
Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP)
Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Kidd, Bill (Glasgow Anniesland) (SNP)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Ross, Douglas (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Abstention
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 9, Against 0, Abstentions 1.
Amendment 120 agreed to.
Amendment 33 moved—[Ross Greer]—and agreed to.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 1, Against 9, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 211 disagreed to.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 42 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 7, Against 3, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 42 agreed to.
Amendment 212 moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy]—and agreed to.
Amendment 27 not moved.
Amendment 213 moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy]—and agreed to.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I remind members that, if amendment 43 is agreed to, amendment 215 will be pre-empted.
Amendment 43 moved—[Ross Greer]—and agreed to.
11:00Amendment 216 moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy].
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division.
For
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Against
Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP)
Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Kidd, Bill (Glasgow Anniesland) (SNP)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Ross, Douglas (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Welcome back to the committee’s stage 2 consideration of the Education (Scotland) Bill.
Amendment 41, in the name of the cabinet secretary, is grouped with amendments 211, 42, 212, 27, 213, 28, 214, 43, 215 to 218, 44, 29, 45, 46, 30, 31, 220 and 53. I point out that, as amendments 41 and 211 are direct alternatives, they can both be moved and decided on, but the text of whichever is the last to be agreed to is what will appear in the bill. Amendments 42 and 212 are also direct alternatives.
If amendment 28 is agreed to, I cannot call amendment 214 due to pre-emption, and if amendment 43 is agreed to, I cannot call amendment 215, again due to pre-emption.
I call the cabinet secretary to move amendment 41 and to speak to all the amendments in the group.