Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 14 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3397 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jackson Carlaw

We have to be careful, as that involves an active case. We cannot really discuss it.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jackson Carlaw

No problem. Thank you very much.

Paul Sweeney has been much concerned with the petition’s progress, and he has been with us online this morning. I will use my discretion to invite him in and see whether he would like to put any questions to you.

Welcome, Mr Sweeney—the floor is yours.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jackson Carlaw

There we are. Thank you, Mr Sweeney. Your contribution and some of the others that we have heard along the way perhaps play into what I might pose as the final question.

The Scottish Government has committed to updating guidance on how local authorities deal with dangerous listed buildings, including undertaking research to inform that work. Is there any point that you might want to volunteer in conclusion, additional to anything that we have discussed, that you would like to see reflected or included in that fresh guidance?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you all very much for what has been a very interesting conversation. We have had the opportunity to consider the petition on a number of occasions, and it does come to mind sometimes in the period between our considerations. When a building that is under threat materialises in the national infrastructural consciousness, one immediately thinks of the provisions that we have been discussing.

We will consider the evidence that we have heard at a future date, and thank you all for your participation. I suspend the meeting briefly.

10:32 Meeting suspended.  

10:33 On resuming—  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Can we incorporate the suggestions made in the ALACHO dispatch in our submission to the minister? Are we agreed?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Yes, we can, absolutely. That would be a perfectly reasonable response.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Not that that is unique.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Can we reserve that option and seek an expedited response?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jackson Carlaw

It is a badge of honour of this committee that we do not let ministers off the hook.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Jackson Carlaw

PE1988, which was lodged by Sue Wallis, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to review the process for allowing raw sewage discharge from homes into coastal waters, to provide additional funding to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency for enforcement and to introduce legislation to ban households from discharging raw sewage. We last considered the petition at our meeting on 30 October 2024, when we agreed to write to the Scottish Government. Its response states that water, waste water and drainage policy consultation is being used to inform its policy development process throughout 2025.

We asked the Scottish Government about SEPA’s purpose to improve the health and wellbeing of people in Scotland, as set out in the Regulatory Reform (Scotland) Act 2014. The response states that the general purpose provides for a clear hierarchy that acknowledges the three elements of sustainable development, but that primacy is to be given to protecting and improving the environment. The Scottish Government states that it is content that SEPA has sufficient resources to apply its approach to regulation and principles across all its functions, as well as its enforcement policy.

The petitioner’s written submission shares her understanding that SEPA has the powers to prosecute for unrepaired pipes but has not done so because of concern that it will become too expensive to pursue. Under the current approach of contacting home owners about changing outfall pipe systems, she points out that there is no follow-up action to check that the required work has been done. The petitioner calls for a review of how SEPA staff monitor direct outfall pipes for homes in Scotland and believes that the Scottish Government should ask SEPA to explain why there have been no prosecutions arising from raw sewage discharges from broken outfall pipes.

Do any members wish to comment in the light of the Scottish Government’s response and/or the petitioner’s response?