The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 857 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Alasdair Allan
We have been speaking about data. Much of the fishing fleet is already embracing technologies such as remote electronic monitoring and catch monitoring. Would it be useful for the use of that technology to be mandatory in these sites and elsewhere?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Alasdair Allan
It is on this subject.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Alasdair Allan
It is the really the same issue as has been raised. You will probably have heard in the previous panel a discussion about the phrase “the best available science”. Obviously, the best available science is all anyone can and should act on, but is the Government constantly assessing where the gaps in the data are in order to try to proactively fill those? That was one of the questions that was being asked by the previous panel.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Alasdair Allan
For people who are perhaps less well acquainted with the subject, could you provide a picture of what practical difference the proposed measures would make in those areas from the point of view of practice and the species that you feel would benefit?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Alasdair Allan
Elspeth, you set out your organisation’s views. I note that the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation is on record as saying that Scottish ministers have been
“willing to adopt common sense measures based on dialogue”.
However, we have just heard some discussion specifically about static gear. How did you seek to represent the views of that sector in the conversations with the Government?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Alasdair Allan
In that case—this applies to anyone on the panel—how do you feel about the opportunities for engagement? How will the conversation go forward, specifically on static gear?
10:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Alasdair Allan
I know that, in the future fisheries management delivery plan, the Scottish Government has committed to a review of penalties for fisheries offences. Has that work been done, and have you any views on penalties and how they would apply in this case and in relation to this order?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Alasdair Allan
Caitlin Turner mentioned the issue of whether we are living up to international best practice. Do any of you have a view on whether some of the proposed sites come nearer to that mark than others?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Alasdair Allan
But those moneys would have to be held by the sheep stock club and not by the grazings committee.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Alasdair Allan
I do not want to jump ahead too far and go into enforcement, but it is important to put on the record that most crofters are doing the right thing, and the reason why those who are doing the right thing get angry about the issue of abandonment is not because they feel that their neighbours are making money out of it; it is because, ultimately, if a township is denuded of people who are active crofters, the collective aspect of crofting becomes impossible in that township.
On the idea of environmental use, the key word seems to be “managed”. You have touched on this, but do you have an idea, even provisionally, of what that word might mean? The land has to be put to environmental use, but that has to be managed use.