The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 918 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Alasdair Allan
The amendment talks about consulting
“such persons as the Scottish Ministers consider may have an interest in, or otherwise be affected by, the regulations”.
Obviously, it would be up to the Government to interpret that, but I think that the scope is pretty broad. It would have to be somebody either interested in or “affected by” the matter in hand.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Alasdair Allan
Do you want to intervene on me? [Laughter.]
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Alasdair Allan
I will speak to my amendments 113 and 114. New section 2F of the 2004 act, introduced by section 1(3) of the bill, sets out the process for setting or amending targets. I am aware that the committee has an interest in those targets, and its stage 1 report highlights recommendations for improvements to be made regarding the need
“to consult and have regard to expertise from specific sectors of the economy with a key role in delivering biodiversity targets.”
I thought that those points were important enough to address, and that it was crucial that the provisions in this section include a consultation requirement. Accordingly, my two amendments seek to address those issues.
My amendment 113 would add a requirement for the Scottish ministers to consult any persons interested in or impacted by the targets before laying regulations that set, amend or remove statutory targets. My amendment 114 would ensure that any pre-commencement consultation can count towards fulfilling that requirement. I believe that my amendments would strengthen transparency and stakeholder engagement in developing biodiversity targets. They reflect the need to consult sectors that are critical to biodiversity delivery, and to build on the expertise and independent advice that is being sought for biodiversity targets. For all those reasons, I will move the amendments.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Alasdair Allan
As we are not in the chamber, this is not a rhetorical question but a genuine one. Could you explain a wee bit about how your amendments interact with things such as the Electricity Act 1989 and other reserved areas? Do they interact in any way?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Alasdair Allan
I was asking—and it is not a rhetorical question—whether you could say a bit more about how or whether your amendments impact in any way on reserved areas such as the Electricity Act 1989.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Alasdair Allan
The measures in the bill that seek to avoid the accidental situation of deemed crofts or grazings shares that are separated from crofts will be welcome. I am trying to get a picture in my head of a potential scenario in a township where several crofts could end up without any shares in common grazings. What would the Government’s view be on that, and what would that mean for any new entrant who did want to keep livestock in the village?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Alasdair Allan
Would they be able to graze livestock if, hypothetically, half the available crofts in a village had become separated from the shares in the common grazings?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Alasdair Allan
You mentioned co-operation with other organisations such as RPID. That has come up in evidence. The issue is related, as it is about enforcement. Can you say a bit more about how that will work? In giving evidence to the committee, directly or indirectly, a number of stakeholders have been looking for RPID and the Crofting Commission to work together more closely to gather evidence about activity or inactivity.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Alasdair Allan
That is helpful. You said that only 25 per cent of crofters have livestock. Although I appreciate that there has been a big decline in the amount of livestock that is kept, does the figure take into account things such as subtenancies, grazing agreements or, indeed, abandoned crofts?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Alasdair Allan
I am talking about people who own a share in a grazing but who do not have a croft in that community.